[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: counterargument to c.lebeau's constant bet size under



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hi!

I am surprise of this argument going on. There is absolutely no doubt that 
the same size bet is a wrong atrtegy. It has been proved again and again that 
risking too large portion of trading capital per position will eventually 
cause even the most profitable trading system to fail. Of curse down sizing 
the bet after a drawdown makes the recovery slower but it avoids the ruin. I 
have been in this biseness for more than 25 years and one of the reason small 
accounts  NEVER survives it's because they are unable to size their bets: 
it's all or nothing.

If you backtest the same system with and without position sizing you will 
find that the drawdowns are smaller ofr the same results.. or if you are 
ready for the same dradowns size your profit will be greater. It has been 
even proved that with sound money management (read bet sizing) you can 
overcome your negative edge in some negative expectation game.

Position sizing is as much important that gatting accurate entry/exit signals.

Good luck to all in your search.

Jean-Jacques Chénier                                
GLOBAL MANAGEMENT                               
tel: 212/758-0725                               
fax: 212/758-0683                               
e-mail: MacroMnt@xxxxxxx
Web:   w<A HREF="www.trendoscil.com">w
w.trendoscil.com</A>