[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SP5 Update - Not Stable



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Yup, as previously posted here, its the TEMP subdirectory in the Windows
directory that needs to be emptied.  Probably doesnt hurt to do the other
temp directory too, but in w98 its the other that's critical.
good luck
nhbob

----- Original Message -----
From: Trevor.Neil@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bfulks@xxxxxxxxxxxx ; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:13 AM
Subject: RE: SP5 Update - Not Stable


Why I tried to load it, but it could not extract because there was not
enough space in the /temp directory. There is lots of space on the computer.
I downloaded it again and the same thing happened. I guess it is a problem
with my computer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Fulks [mailto:bfulks@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 31 May 2000 11:58
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SP5 Update - Not Stable


At 12:58 PM -0700 5/30/00, David Fenstemaker wrote:

>I have been running the SP 5 update since last week,
>and true to Omega, it is less stable than SP3 or SP4.

<snip>

>The biggest problem with SP 5 is optimization,
>or changing system parameters while off line.




Although it has only been running for a short time, I have seen more
stability and speed with the new release. It is clearly faster for
optimization runs than previous versions.

Below is a summary of the time in seconds required per test for an
optimization run I that have used as a benchmark on several machines.
(These results include tests by several people on the same
benchmark.) It shows the that TS2000i was about the same speed as
TS4.0 through SP4c but became a factor of about two faster with SP5.

The slowest was 8.7 seconds per test for a slower machine on TS4.0
down to 1.4 seconds per test on the fastest machine on SP5.

This is for a clean install of SP3, upgraded to SP4c, then upgraded to SP5.

I wondered how the users are finding the quality level and speed of SP5?

Latest summary of benchmarks attached below.

Bob

----------------------------

The time per test was as follows (in seconds). (The total time for an
optimization run would be these numbers multiplied be the number of
tests performed in the run.)

                                OS      TS4.0   TS2000i  TS2000i
                                                  SP4c     SP5
HP Pavilion 8550 Celeron 500  Win98     8.7
Gateway GP6 PII 300           WinNT     6.4
Gateway E-5200 PIII 500       WinNT     5.3      4.7      2.3
RK-500  (AMD K6 500)         Win2000    4.9*     5.5**
Athlon A-750  machine        Win2000             2.3      1.4

*  20 GB IDE disk
** 9 GB SCSI disk


------

NBench performance numbers on the machines:

                        RK500   E-5200  8550C   A-750

CPU     Performance,    MOPs/sec
         Integer Speed:  481     363     362     599
         Floating Speed:  82      74      73     162

Memory Move Performance (MBytes/sec)
         region width  random  random  random  random
         1KB     1       216     214     124     400
         1KB     2       345     430     248     794
         1KB     4       913     897     496    1588
         1KB     8      1335    1100     737    2075
         10KB    1       193     215     123     404
         10KB    2       318     419     246     791
         10KB    4       798     836     495    1580
         10KB    8      1249    1060     728    2062
         100KB   1        14      29      37      76
         100KB   2        28      58      73     150
         100KB   4        55     114     145     296
         100KB   8       134     276     294     720
         1000KB  1         6      16      10      23
         1000KB  2        13      32      19      46
         1000KB  4        25      64      37      91
         1000KB  8        61     150      90     176

         region  width serial  serial  serial  serial
         1KB     1       319     255     171     495
         1KB     2       393     503     341     965
         1KB     4      1019    1010     697    1904
         1KB     8      1313    1033     688    2007
         10KB    1       293     247     170     499
         10KB    2       374     510     337     978
         10KB    4       955    1024     691    1910
         10KB    8      1222    1026     682    2003
         100KB   1        53     116      91     221
         100KB   2        83     181     165     402
         100KB   4       122     247     270     651
         100KB   8       135     276     295     723
         1000KB  1        24      53      35      51
         1000KB  2        38      90      58      95
         1000KB  4        55     135      83     168
         1000KB  8        61     146      90     183

Disk (MBytes/sec)
         thread: C         0       0       0       0
         write:  C        22      16       5       8
         read:   C        23      17       5      11

         thread: C         0       0       0       0
         write:  C        22      18       5      10
         read:   C        23      16       6      26

         thread: D         0       0               0
         write:  D        16      17               8
         read:   D        21      17              16

         thread: D         0       0
         write:  D        15      16
         read:   D        21      16

         thread: E         0       0
         write:  E        19      16
         read:   E        20      18

         thread: E         0       0
         write:  E        21      18
         read:   E        21      16