|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
The idea makes some sense I guess. If we develop trading systems to
remove the human element (errors) from making trading decisions, one
could take it a step further and remove the human element from
discretionary trading, applying filters to the discretionary process.
monte
Larry Poh wrote:
>
> Now there's a very interesting concept. Ummm
>
> Larry
>
> "Monte C. Smith" wrote:
>
> > Perhaps one could hook oneself to a polygraph/biofeedback/EEG device
> > while trading, and develop data sets to analyze to see when there is a
> > high probability of making losing trading decisions based on
> > psychophysical patterns.
> >
> > Monte
> >
> > robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe if you can program speech into words like MS is doing. Making it
> > > ready available to everybody then a programmer would see the profit
> > > potential of having a system that can handle real time programming. a
> > > astute market observer and trader could watch and input different changes
> > > he see visually into a system in real time. The system would immediately
> > > adjust itself and make trades accordingly. Example tensions are high market
> > > is level waiting a fed announcement. Market of late has been discounting
> > > negative reports so if the report is bad and a long trade is indicated take
> > > the trade. Another example market has been discounting negative fed reports
> > > but only after several hours later so if a long trade is indicated then no
> > > trade.
> > >
> > > Robert
|