|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
HELLO, HELLO ???
> One of the major weakness in TS is its in-ability to do post
> analysis - the analysis of the trading signals themselves.
> Thats the way it is now and I don't know they *can* make it any better
> in the future.
Regarding the above statement and the keyword "can".......
please change that to "want".
Omega is moving in a new direction.....EL is languishing.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence Chan [mailto:stnahc@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 8:10 AM
> To: Omega List
> Subject: Re: SURVEY RESULT
>
>
>
> all banks/brokerages in house use proprietary model and
> backtest that way.
>
> since the day I stopped trusting TS backtest results ...
> and coded my own way to backtest, I immediately go into
> a land of freedom in creating models that can do way better.
>
> The easylanguage concept is a great idea - it bounded all those
> who use it in its framework and forcing most people who use
> it think the way it is allowed in TS ... which then killed most
> of the really profitable ideas ... I like it, less competition >:)
>
> One of the major weakness in TS is its in-ability to do post
> analysis - the analysis of the trading signals themselves.
> Thats the way it is now and I don't know they can make it any better
> in the future.
>
> -Lawrence Chan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ross S Bond <ross.bond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > In Lawrence's survey results the closing line
> >
> > "...and probably that's why TS is the choice of tool as TS4 no
> matter how
> > shit its system testing is, its basic drawing capability is/was
> the best."
> >
> > interests me. If TS4's systems testing is shit, what app is
> better? I sort
> > of gather that there is not a lot else available for serious system
> > writing/testing/trading.
> >
> > Ross Bond
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
|