|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Mark:
Well, soon you will be able to receive stocks as well as comm. over CQG and
it will be programmable. It is programmable right now, however you have to
give them your system or indicator and they will program it for you. It has
just about every feature that you could ever want, and I do mean every, for
trading options and futures. It's amazing the features they have added in
just the last year. The only objection that I have is that it costs so damn
much. It's okay to charge those prices for the instututions, but for us
small guys its a bit over the top. I've had many conversations with them
about lowering their prices to the small investor, but with little success.
I think they would get a larger share of the data feed business if they
would consider this.
Lamont Cranston
"who knows what evil lurks"
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <SBowie@xxxxxxx>; <JCrystal@xxxxxxx>; <sshowers@xxxxxxx>;
<blaforce@xxxxxxx>; <salescontact@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <dtnhelp@xxxxxxx>;
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <webmaster@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 10:37 AM
Subject: Re[2]: DBC Signal - Net Recipe
> Hello TradeWynne,
>
> >> Also, how is it possible that DTN can provide substantially
> >> the same service (i.e. RT sat) for around $1k/yr =less= than
> >> DBC? TIA
>
> Tac> James:
>
> Tac> I can't say about all this, but from talking to both for some time I
> Tac> would say the corporate culture @ DBC/BMI is Lie, Deny, Do As
> Tac> Little as Possible.
>
> I can tell you plenty about DBC/BMI problems. Its their upper
> management thats the problem. I personally called Brad LaForce and
> Bret Charlesworth myself and asked to get a SDK for the E SIGNAL
> online service and they said they would have someone contact me.
>
> That person was Sheennan Showers Manager of Business Development.
> Well they seem to be all upset that Omega is entering the data feed
> business and will be competing against them. So It seemed that they
> were interested in TW hooking up to E-Signal. See they like
> FutureSource are up the creek without Omega and they know it. They
> will never be a serious data vendor without a serious software package
> to hook up to. Look at CQG they would own the data feed business IF
> they had a good software package that you could actually "seriously"
> program. I have done nothing but run into brick walls with DBC,
> DTN, CQG, PC Quote, FutureSource.
>
> The opinions are all my personal and in no way reflect the attitude of
> those around me. Mark Brown
>
> Tac> While DTN actually is TRYING to do a good job.
> Tac> Many good people that work for DBC/BMI do not last long. There
> Tac> are better opportunities for quality people in that South Bay, San
Fran,
> Tac> San Jose area.
>
> Tac> Unless DBC buys DTN (ugh!) expect DTN to take a larger and larger
> Tac> share of the pie.
>
> Tac> But don't believe me. Look for yourself: DTLN vs. DBCC
>
> Tac> Bill Wynne
> Tac> SmartTrades.com
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mark Brown mailto:markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
|