[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: trends



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry & Cora <jerryandcora@xxxxxxxx>
To: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: trends


> Hi Mark & Howard
> > Yes, maybe  we are saying the same thing.  What I find is that
congestion
> or rests are usually 3 to 10 bars where prices move (trend  sideways or
> contrary to main move) then in usually 3 bars the price moves
> to
> > a new congestion (rest area).  Overall this can be called a trend even
> > though more time is spent in the congestion (rest) area where no
> discernable
> > trend exists.  The  jumps are usually dramatic.  I wish I could show
this
> > with a chart but don't know how to get the list to accept my
attachments.
> >
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:58 AM
> Subject: Re[2]: trends
>
>
> > Hello  Howard,
> >
> > HJ> I think you are just calling a trend a "jump". We're
> > HJ> all saying the same with different words.
> >
> > HJ> H
> >
> > I  think  they  are trying to make the point that what appears to be a
> > trend  sometimes  looking  back  on  a chart is really just a bunch of
> > counter  trend  trading  ranges with strait up or down spurts of price
> > action that would have been impossible to get on.  but looking back in
> > hind sight you can see that its a trend sure.
> >
> > mark
> >
> >
>