|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
If the cinema will be too small to get the main attractions until we get
those nice seats, with all featured movies playing in mono instead of THX,
then let us get nice seats rather than saying: "the cinema is small and
neat, a pitty that we do not get to sit comfortably watching some good
movies with good sound".
Doubling the memory is 200$, cutting the calculation/backtesting/browsing
time in half might be many thousands of dollars plus, and at the same time
TS could once again be called 2000 compliant instead of 100-compliant. With
the swapping technology in Windows, those that prefer low speed/low cost can
still decide not to buy the memory.
Only theory, but if that is the cost for saving, then we are not saving in
the right spaces. There should be (and might be) other and better reasons
than 200$ in memory cost.
> My point was that we should not double the current spacing in
> a cinema just for
> seating one extra large sized customer - too much of a waste
> of resource use.
|