|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Alan Mi wrote:
> Why not the more intuitive 20000101, you are left wondering.
Many folks wonder why some of us ask for double precision. If DP were
already in there, we could easily go to a compataible and convenient Y2k
solution instead of the hokey 2000 = 100 patch we now have.
Let's hear it for double precision...
Larry
|