|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Right. Too bad I wasn't aware of this list before I bought TS. Any class
action lawsuits out there that we could join? Obviously asking nicely for
redress isn't working.
At 08:35 AM 12/6/1999 -0600, Mark Brown wrote:
>Hello Omega,
>
>I wrote this letter on Monday, September 21, 1998 8:45 AM more than a
>year ago. Sorry had you TS2000i users taken me more seriously you
>would have not wasted your time. Even if you get TS to run the
>mathmatical errors in it make the product useless for serious trading
>where your money is at risk.
>
>
>PO:
>Plotting drawing tools and indicator into the future has been announced as a
>coming soon feature in the TS5 beta 3 white papers (not White Waters, please
>read carefully), as well as for other features that were added in the next
>beta version.
>
>MB:
>So will any flavor of TS 5.0 allow plotting into the future? The answer is
>NO!
>
>PO:
>So, I'll give you a deadline.
>If nothing occurs in this sense before 990331, I 'll join your team and
>will personally be involved in the TS4 patch battle (or maybe a diplomatic
>battle that I prefer, and find more efficient) Do not forget to recall this
>to me right in time if the case apply .
>
>MB:
>IF, IF Cruz releases TS 5.0 before the above mentioned date. It will be
>buggy as hell, I have had MANY beta testers call me from great distances at
>their expense to tell me how unstable it is. I have several offer to send
>me their beta's because they put 4.0 back on. If this is not the case then
>either you have never done a beta before for Omega or else you would admit
>thats why we have 21 builds now on TS 4.0 after the release. Omega seems to
>build it as we go, fix it as they bitch. So excuse me while I apply the
>technique that Bill Cruz has taught me so well to use. I'm bitchin now
>ahead of time "excuse me" while I try to make all our lives a little more
>pleasant. Dipping bugs in chocolate may work for you but to me its still a
>BUG!
>
>PS It was brought up WHY wont Omega answer our pleas for answers?
>
>1. They are too busy answering the phones for sales and could give a shit
>less about us?
>2. They are too busy studying how to send yet another helpful tech solution
>that will surely screw up your TS if follow their advice? I might add that
>they dont use their own product and thats why they never have a clue anytime
>they send out a solution to us. Then like usual we get the correct answers
>to our problems form our own list members..they never learn.
>3. They are too busy planning on the next Wally World Conference, so they
>can sell you all the information that you should have received in the first
>place with the program you purchased?
>4. They are too busy figuring out a way to indirectly pay the main defender
>here on the list so he can continue to perpetuate the myths and claim no
>compensation from them?
>5. They are too busy playing musical chairs too see who will be the next
>Omega employee of the month that gets their chance to show how
>unknowledgeable they are with their product? Does anyone with some time
>want to compile a list of those that have fallen by the wayside in the past
>years?
>6. Bill Cruz is too busy giving a little Island country's leader advise on
>tactics he has learned here in America about how to ignore the pleas of his
>clients?
>
>P.S. Bill Cruz you are not much of a man to have Sam Tennis, Janette Perez,
>Rico Font, Melody Blais, Mitch Ackles, Miles Dunbar, Darla Tuttle, and a
>whole host of others I dont remember at present do your bidding for you. Be
>man enough to come on this forum and explain to a thousand and growing list
>members exactly what your plan of action is and commit to a deadline to
>resolve these issues. Dont send women and children to fight your battles
>for you! Hide no longer like a coward behind you innocent employees.
>Should I hunt you down and confront you at Futures West? What will you do
>then? Better to answer our concerns from the comfort of your corporate
>hiding place than to be made a spectacle of in public? We all waiting for
>your response, but I guess I'll have to just see you at Futures West
>instead?
>
>
>
>Mark Brown
>-------------------------
>"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it." - Clint Eastwood
>-------------------------
>
>
>
>--
>
>.oİş°¨¨°şİ[ WWW.MARKBROWN.COM ]İş°¨¨°şİo.
|