[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MAN'S LIFE QUA MAN



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Omega Man

please promise that if Rina Systems contact you and want the same technical
support & PR that you will give them VALUE FOR MONEY and make their products
work as advertised



>
>Yes, you may choose to live your life as a complainer, never achieving
anything yourself, "accomplishing" things only to the extent that others
(the real producers) see fit to humor you.  But that is not the life that
you *should* choose.  That is not the life that I want you to choose.
>
>Now, let us be clear:  The complainer achieves nothing, accomplishes
nothing, produces nothing.  He may attempt to inflict pain or guilt on the
value producer, as a beggar or moocher does, in a desperate effort to
convince the value producer to produce for him.  But it is always the value
producer, and the value producer alone, who creates, dreams, inspires, and
achieves.
>
>Man has choices!  He may certainly choose to live as a parasite - a
complainer, a maggot, a vampire, a looter, a beggar, a moocher - subject to
the whims of the value producer.
>
>Ah, but to live qua man (as man should) is something different.  For man to
live qua man means to live freely and independently - to think, to produce,
to work, to achieve.  Living as man should means living by the work of one's
own mind, not begging another to think for you.
>
>Yes, sometimes the beggar receives a nickel in his cup.  Sometimes the
looter gathers stolen goods.  But in neither case is he producing anything
and in neither case are we witness to man's life qua man.
>
>
>
>
> ---- you wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999 editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> > This is about who will achieve something and who will not.  Complaints
>> > and bashing, even if correct, achieve nothing.
>>
>> I would disagree. Here is the logic:
>>
>> (1) There are MANY complaints about Omega on this list.
>>
>> (2) As a result, it is clear to the casual reader that there are major
>> problems with Omega software.
>>
>> (3) This will have a distinctly negative influence on how many sales
>> Omega can make, and the reputation of the company as a reliable software
>> producer.
>>
>> (4) Omega realizes this, and will increase their efforts to make the
>> software better.
>>
>>    (4a) Omega will first try to fix this with additional marketing, but
>>         at some point will conclude that funds to improve product will
>>         have a better payoff long term.
>>
>> Given the above, I believe complaints *DO* help spur Omega to build
>> a better product, and are thus worthwhile to do.
>>
>> Could you point out the flaw(s) that would completely invalidate the
above
>> logic, and include an alternative chain of logic to show why complaining
>> does not help?
>>
>> Larry
>>
>
>