[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RESEARCH RESULTS ol: Fixed Ratio loses in a comparison



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

At 09:26 PM 9/6/99 -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
>Over the Labor Day weekend, I decided to try out the
>Fixed Ratio approach for choosing position sizes when
>trading commodity futures.  This scheme appears in Ryan
>Jones's book "The Trading Game":

-snip-


Mark was kind enough to send me some details of these 2 tests,
and I'd like to point out why I would choose the Jones
method. FR (fixed ratio) is good at allowing size to increase
faster in the beginning and then slow down and get more
conservative as the acct gets larger. Below is the year ending
acct balances from Mark's data for the first few years to
illustrate:
year  spear	jones
1987	113K	130K
1988	149K	199K
1989	212K	384K
1990	336K	608K

>From this point on, FF starts catching up and then blows
by FR, since it is then trading larger size and risking
more of the acct/trade than FR. At the end of the test,
FR is only trading 29 contracts. Thats pretty small for
being up 5 mil+ . FF is trading from 80 to 194 cnts.
Jones talks about switching to FF after reaching a certain
point in the acct, but we should all be so lucky as to
have to worry about that. I'd rather see the better
bottom line in those first 4 years.

regards,
rich



___________________________
Rich Estrem, Tucson,Az.
estrem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx