|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Attached is Futures Truth's reply to the recent question. I'm not
really knowledgeable enough to take a "side" in this debate; i just thot
it would be interesting to hear from the subject company.
Conrad Bowers
Received: from lexington.ioa.net (lexington.ioa.net [208.131.128.7])
by sparrow.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA17522
for <cpbow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 07:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (ppp236.arden.dialup.ioa.com [205.138.39.30])
by lexington.ioa.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA14309
for <cpbow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:51:29 -0400
From: "FUTURES TRUTH" <futures@xxxxxxx>
To: <cpbow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How system changes are reported
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:50:21 -0400
Message-ID: <01bef2f6$fc158d20$LocalHost@xxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
We do not normally allow new versions of a system. In some instances we
will allow it, along with a name change to the system or something that
notes that the system has been changed.
-----Original Message-----
From: cb <cpbow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: futures@xxxxxxx <futures@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, August 29, 1999 5:16 PM
Subject: How system changes are reported
>On a trading email list I subscribe to the question has come up twice
>now: "If a system author improves a system thru parameter changes or
>other modifications (including portfolio choice) what version is tested
>in subsequent issue of Futures Truth? Please describe your procedure
>for handling this.
>
>I have always thought highly of your role in the industry and have
>occassionally ordered one of your reports on a system I was
>considering. I've also recommended FT to people. So I'm interested in
>this question that has been raised.
>
>Thanks for your time in replying,
>
>Conrad Bowers
>
|