|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have always thought of Neal W. as very
"wishi-washi", somewhat of a shady character
regardless of any number of nice posts he made here.
In this very same list he blasted technical analysis
and system testing (and technical analists and system
traders) relentlessly without any apparent motivation
(if he is so against it, what is he doing in a mailing
list of technical analysis and system trading).
While at the same time used to have glowing remarks of
Windows on Wallstreet (another technical analysis
product), and a negative review of tradestation on
his website. Then he had 'his' system written in easy
language posted as well!?!?!?!. It seemed to me that
he couldn’t decide between his beliefs and $$$s.
I couldn’t decide what is he about… too bad I lost the
address of his site.
H
--- Alexander Levitin <alevitin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Bob:
>
> Your indignation against the spammers is
> understandable. I too have "pre
> justice" against spammers and their products.
>
> However, if you would write a book (as Neal did) or
> a software for sale (as
> Mark is trying to do) would you send an e-mail to
> the people you think may
> be interesting in your book or software, especially
> if you know some of
> them personally and some of them inquire about your
> "creation" in the past?
> I guess that what Neal has done.
>
> As of Neal's reputation. I think the writer (or any
> producer of the product
> for sale) has two reputations. One is personal that
> come out of his
> personal behavior. People, who met Neal would belive
> that he is a
> gentlemen. Another reputation came from the product
> one develops. You judge
> the product on its own merit. (The book is good or
> not, the software is
> good or not). Those two reputations may diverge. For
> example, anyone who
> personally met Bill Cruz can not admit his charms,
> but his product has to
> fight for the reputation on its own.
>
> So when we can, let's try to exercise a discretion
> in judgment, that what
> the judgment is for, isn't it?
>
> Yours, Alex.
>
>
> At 10:42 AM 8/29/99 -0700, Bob Perry wrote:
> >I, and some of you, recently received SPAM from
> "Neal T. Weintraub"
> ><ntw@xxxxxxxxxxx> or someone purported to be him.
> It came unsolicited
> >and yet said I was on some email "list" he
> maintains (I am not). . It
> wasn't so much an
> >advertisement for his new ... book,
>
> >Either way, it hurts his reputation, and if it
> *was* him that sent it
> >out; "Shame on you, Neal, for stooping so low."
> >
> >Bob Perry
> >San Jose, CA
> >
>
>
|