[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Off topic....



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Randy, I am sorry that you are wrong. When Stalin killed 20,000,000 of his
own
people Russia didn't have more than 90,000,000 population, so it would be
more
like 25%.

If law abiding citizens were disarmed, it will be only government and
criminals
left armed. And you can never garantee that criminal will not become a head
of
state. Clinton just came close enough.

As you might know, rescent history of Yugoslavia was very turbulent one.
There
was lots of demonstrations across the country and citizens were harrased and
beaten up by police on regular basis. Except in a province of Montenegro.
Montenigrans are mointin people (no digresive jokes please) and possesion of
weapons is question of tradition. Well, during the demonstrations in
Montenigran
capital, police always kept the distance and didn't provoke any violence.

One advantage conservatives have over liberals is that thay are not so naive
when it comes to the powers of the state.

Regards
Dejan Corovic

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy [mailto:jrehler@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 August 1999 03:57
> To: KIMBOLEGSA@xxxxxxx
> Cc: Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Off topic....
>
>
> Let's see 25,000 dead in US divided by the poplation of
> 250,000,000 gives us
> 0.0001 or less than 1 percent of 1 percent of the US population dead by
> guns.
>
> Pretty low odds, I'll take that trade. Perhaps you are less risk adverse
> than I. Can't understand how you could trade with a psychological profile
> like that though.
>
> Will the TV networks present the fact that less than 1 percent of
> 1 percent
> of the US population are killed by guns? Would they do it, no way! What is
> the agenda? Disarm the people. Why? Control.
>
> I'll dig up the stat's of people murdered by their
> governments(they usually
> didn't have the right to bear arms), but I'd venture to say it
> would be more
> significant than 1 percent of 1 percent. Off  the top of my head, Stalin
> murdered conservatively 20,000,000. If you divide that by the estimate of
> the population of Russia 146,861,022 you get .136183 or 13.6
> percent of the
> population murdered by their government and they didn't have the right to
> bear arms. Which is precisely why we have the 2nd Amendment.
>
> Little excerpt: (Prime Minister Chretien to be first Western Statesman to
> Remember Genocidal Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33
> For Immediate Release (Winnipeg), January 22, 1999
>
> Canada's Ukrainian community has welcomed the announcement by the Prime
> Minister's Office that The Right Honourable Jean Chretien, Prime
> Minister of
> Canada, will be laying a memorial wreath at the National Famine
> Monument in
> Kyiv, Ukraine, at 3:00 pm on Wednesday, January 27th.
>
> The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33, engineered by the former Soviet Union,
> caused the deaths of at least 7 million Ukrainians and was covered up and
> officially denied by the Government of the former Soviet Union. Recently,
> the Government of Ukraine has declared that every fourth Saturday of
> November will be set aside for a National Day of Mourning and
> Remembrance of
> the Famine Victims. Prime Minister Chretien will be the first western
> statesman to pay his respects to these millions of victims during
> his first
> states visit to Ukraine.)
>
> If you don't like it (the facts and America) then immigrate to
> China, where
> perhaps you can be one of the lucky, who is shot in the base of the skull
> and your organs sold for cash to be collected by the state.
>
> Randy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KIMBOLEGSA@xxxxxxx <KIMBOLEGSA@xxxxxxx>
> To: jrehler@xxxxxxxxx <jrehler@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, July 31, 1999 8:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Off topic....
>
>
> >In a message dated 7/31/99 7:24:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
> >jrehler@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> >Death by gun in the UK < 50
> >Death by gun in the US > 25,000
> >
> >Population Ratio        5:1
> >Death by gun ratio 500:1
> >
> >Surprised by These Facts?
> >
> >Maybe it's because the TV networks are deliberately not telling you about
> >them!
> >and if they are, maybe you're not listening
> >
> >
>