|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robyn:
Congrats... AND DITTOS.
Always remember that the difference between a lawyer and a
catfish is that one is a scum-sucking bottom dweller and the
other is a fish!
----- Original Message -----
From: The Omega Man <editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Robyn Greene <greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: omega list <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 21:48
Subject: Re: LEARNING
>
> A lawyer! Ye Gods! Lucky I didn't step on you. I've
even gone out of my
> way to crush parasites in the past.
>
> Do you mind my asking: Have you ever produced anything?
Or do you strictly
> leech off value producers?
>
>
> (Nice company TJ. You all should get together: you, Mark
Down, and the
> leech.)
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robyn Greene <greene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: The Omega Man <editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: omega list <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 9:34 PM
> Subject: Re: LEARNING
>
>
> > The Omega Man wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, Robyn! But your time is your most valuable asset!
You didn't spend
> the
> > > money so you paid more dearly for your knowledge than
you had to! You
> paid
> > > with part of your life!
> >
> > I'm a lawyer - so you don't have to tell me that time is
money. OTOH -
> since
> > time is money - one can ill afford wasting it exploring
every "market
> miracle"
> > piece of hype that's out there - whether it's in the
form of software -
> books -
> > courses - videos - etc. - etc. Which is not to say that
there isn't some
> decent
> > stuff out there. It's just not the kind of stuff that
promises to make
> you rich
> > in a couple of months. Only way you can do that is by
becoming a lawyer
> and
> > getting a $5 million verdict your first time out <g>.
> >
> > FWIW - I especially hate lousy software - because -
while I can easily
> conclude
> > that a book - course - video - indicator - whatever - is
nonsense in a
> couple of
> > hours - it usually takes a pretty long time to learn
enough about a new
> > complicated piece of software to conclude with a
reasonable degree of
> certainty
> > that it's no good (or good).
> >
> > Also FWIW - since I don't know you - I'm a long time
user of SuperCharts
> (back
> > to 1993). It's a very good stable piece of software IMO
(I've used it
> with
> > Windows 3.1, Windows 95 and Windows 98 - on everything
from a 386 to a
> fairly
> > current Pentium II) - it does everything I need - and -
if it were Y2K
> compliant
> > - I'd probably stick with it for another decade and
forget about reading
> the
> > software "reviews" on this list. Robyn
> >
> >
>
|