|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have been studying Drummond Geometry for a few years now and have studied
all the lessons of the present course that have been released so far. This
method is one with meat on it, but it is not for the faint of heart.
Markets are hard to trade and this method is as hard to learn as markets
are hard to trade. You will find no B. Williams' style bullshit about
flowing with the markets and you can make money. You will not get satisfied
if you want a system of buy/sell signals spoon fed to you. The PL dot is
only a toe in the waters of this very difficult methodology. The learning
curve is very steep. And it takes a whole new way of looking at the world.
I'd recommend staying away from Drummond if you don't like hard work,
frustration, mental and emotional challenges, self-scrutiny and
self-transformation. If this methodology is not suited to your personality,
you'll probably hate it. If you find that it does fit, it could be a great
learning experience in alot more ways than to just make money in the markets.
There is alot more info at www.pldot.com
David Cicia
At 01:17 PM 6/9/99 -0400, Gerald Marisch wrote:
>I downloaded the recently-posted PLDOT.ELA.
>
>The study appears to be an extremely-sensitive "MA" based on
>3 (4?) prior O-H-L-C prices, and more sensitive than the
>VIDYA concepts or the Jurik MAs I use. (The "sensitivity"
>to current prices seems to decrease with additional O-H-L-C
>inputs.) Past posts reference "...the Hearnes article".
>I'm not familiar with the article.
>
>Changing the "STYLE" from "Dot" to "Line" suggests that this
>study may have the potential of being an extremely valuable
>tool for maximizing profits on a 1-minute SP.
>
>Anyone have a reference to how the PLDOT.ELA study can be
>used most-effectively, where "...the Hearnes article..." can
>be found, or a reference source for more info on the
>PLDOT.ELA?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>
|