|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
TJ says: "consistent success is predicated on using stuff that no one else
or only a very few people are using in their trading..."
Can't say that I agree... Money is made anticipating what everyone else,
particularly the bigger players, will do. Very standard technical analysis
predicts moves just fine and with plenty of time to join in. Using what
everyone else is using works just fine.
***************************
Also, what's the big hesitation about laying out some cash to check into the
tools that are out there? Advanced GET? I love it. Damn. What's the big
deal? Lease it for a few months and see what you think.
If you are worried about laying out a little cash for something that you
might learn from then you are worrying about the wrong thing! Worry about
what happens when you stop learning. If you want to try a tool, indicator,
system or whatever then try it! What's the worst that can happen? You lose
a few hundred or a few thousand? Big deal. You just might come across
something that has a little value...
The Omega Man
----- Original Message -----
From: tj <tradejacker@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 8:16 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: Advanced Get
> --- tj <tradejacker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: tj <tradejacker@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Get
> > To: charles meyer <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > maybe the question you should ask is why should i buy the same stuff
> > that everyone else is buying? consistent success is predicated on
> > using
> > stuff that no one else or only a very few people are using in their
> > trading. think about this...floor traders are fading the signals from
> > the very same packages you named (i may get pattern smasher for this
> > very reason....fading signals from commercial packages (like mermer's
> > ets) is very profitable :)) no thanks, i'll pass, and make my own
> > educated guesses :)) you can go nuts trying to figure out these
> > things
> > and what the author intends, ie, why is one signal valid now and then
> > an identical signal is not valid at another time? a lot of time and
> > money is wasted this way. at least when i use my own stuff i don't
> > need
> > to ask these questions, i just do it.
> >
> > TJ
> >
> > btw, probably a few make money using these things, but i'd bet that
> > 95%+ don't make consistent money, year in and year out, doing it
> >
> > btw2, i'm not against all vendors, just the majority who are scammers
> > knowingly and unknowingly. i'd focus on tools (like jurik's stuff and
> > kaufman's efficiency ratio, for example) that make me a more
> > productive
> > trader. the tool's math might be complex, but the utilization is
> > simple.
> >
> >
> > --- charles meyer <chmeyer@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Thanks for your words of wisdom. Can I infer that to the list with
> > > Golden Box and Advanced Get we can add Fibonacci Trader,
> > > Dynamic Trader, Nature's Pulse and Pattern Smasher? Regards
> > > the idea of a 'vendor that promises turning points in advance' I am
> > > awfully curious to know how often these different software
> > packages,
> > > which I assume use different calculation methodologies, agree as
> > > to a future price and time for a turning point. If not, how would
> > > one
> > > know which program to believe at any given time. That is to say,
> > if
> > > each is
> > > giving a different answer which is to be believed? I wonder if
> > > anyone has
> > > done any comparative analysis of which one, if any, does
> > > the better job of 'working consistetly'? Perhaps you have already
> > > answered the question and here I am thinking 'say it ain't so tj',
> > > 'say it aint's so'..............
>
|