|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
CQG has a service for professionals, and as far as I can tell, the only real
disadvantage is that it is comparatively costly. I looked at CQG before going
with FutureSource, equally professional for data and less costly. I don't
particularly like FS' software, but their datafeed has been terrific... I wish
one of the stock datafeeds was as reliable and trouble free, and it may be that
CQG is that datafeed.
Jim Allen
Mark Simms wrote:
> Has anyone ever reviewed CQG's software ?
>
> Wow - I reviewed their website and they claim to have an incredible battery
> of indicators and statistics built-in.....and much option support as well.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joel Beck [mailto:beck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 1999 7:44 PM
> > To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: Bug Report Example
> >
> >
> > Gaius,
> >
> > I'm curious, what is it about MetaStock that you didn't/don't like. What
> > makes it a "joke" in your opinion?
> >
> > Joel
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gaius Marius [mailto:magnus@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 11:27 PM
> > To: Omega-List
> > Subject: Re: Bug Report Example
> >
> > Unfortunately, right now, TS 4.0 b21 (even with its flaws) is the best
> > product out there for the retail trader. MetaStock is a joke. Windows on
> > Wall street is nowhere near TS 4.0. With Ensign for Windows, I'd
> > hate to be
> > dependant on a one man operation. TradeLab is vaporware. TraderWare is in
> > alpha. TS 5.0 or Ts 2000i or PS 2000i or what ever you want to
> > call it is a
> > piece of shit.
> >
|