|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Would anyone have the code for the Chandelier thrust?
thanks
Philip
-----Original Message-----
From: William Vedder, Jr <bved01@xxxxxxx>
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 30 April 1999 12:02
Subject: Testing Exits (Wanring: Long Dull Post)
>Using Dave DeLuca's Random Trader code, I've been testing various exit
>strategies and their properties. I'm using daily data for IBM from
>1/4/84 thru 3/17/99. Here are the exits I've tested:
>
>After a random entry:
>
>1. Exit each trade after 11 days
>2. Exit using Chandelier Standard (using 3 ATRs)
>3. Exit using Chandelier Thrust (using 3 ATRs)
>4. Exit using Parabolic (as coded in TradeStation)
>
>Here are some of the test results:
>
>Exit No. 1 2 3 4
>No. Trades 4068 3909 4840 2288
>Avg Trade Len 11 17 8 11
>Avg MAE (pts) -2.39 -2.17 -2.01 -2.17
>Avg MFE (pts) 2.36 3.99 2.08 3.01
>Max Equity (k$) 1.6 195 11.2 250
>Min Equity (k$) (181) (18) (70) (9)
>End Equity (k$) (152) 176 (51) 245
>Profit Eff (%) 63.4 42.4 80.3 48.6
>Loss Eff (%) 63.2 75.0 79.6 68.8
>Win % 48.2 37.6 50.8 40.3
>
>Each trade includes comm/skid of $60.
>
>The Chandelier exit is Chuck LeBeau's posted here previously. It
>basically exits a long trade after price has retraced 3 ATRs from the
>highest H since entry. The Chandelier "Thrust" reverses the logic
>somewhat (attempting to minimize profit giveback) by exiting (longs) at
>the lowest L since entry PLUS 3 ATRs. The parabolic exit uses the canned
>TS indicator to exit (longs) when price drops thru the parabolic price
>calculated using the standard accelfactor of 0.02.
>
>MFE and MAE are maximum favorable excursion and maximum adverse
>excursion as written about by John Sweeney.
>
>Profit Eff is the profit efficiency calculated as (for winning longs):
>(Exit Price - Entry Price)/(Highest H since entry - Entry Price) * 100%
>Higher numbers indicate less profit giveback.
>
>The Loss Eff is loss efficiency calculated (for losing longs):
>(Entry price - Exit Price)/(Entry Price - Lowest L since entry) * 100%
>Lower numbers indicate the exit is making the best of a bad situation.
>
>These results tell me:
>* in terms of maximizing equity, the best exit appears to be the
> parabolic.
>
>* the Chandeleir exit does do what it's supposed to ie. catch the big
> moves. It's MFE was by far the largest of the group. It's also very
> profitable.
>
>* the Chandelier Thrust does do what it's supposed to ie. try to
> minimize profit giveback. HOWEVER, as can be seen by the ending
> equity (poorer than standard Chandelier), minimizing profit giveback
> doesn't do much for the bottom line. It's nice psychologically to
> avoid profit giveback, it much more important to stay with the big
> moves. This is what the big boys always preach, eh?
>
>* winning % isn't important. The exit w/ the highest win % lost $.
>
>* the parabolic is able to minimize losses as well as the Chandelier.
> Additionally, it captures profit better (higher profit eff) and gets
> out of losers sooner (smaller loss efficiency).
>
>Comments/criticisms are welcome.
>
>As I get time, I'll code the parabolic exit with Wong's entry and post
>the results. Since Wong's system only entered long trades, I'll include
>a short entry. I'll also want to test the resulting system on other
>equities.
>
>Regards,
>Bill Vedder
>
|