|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
hey PIERRE
where you been ? - at least EARL got you out of hiding......what happened to your
AOL acc - conflicts with TS 00 00 i ?
rgds hans
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> À : Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date : jeudi 22 avril 1999 02:00
> Objet : Re: Omega Record Revenues And 51% Increase In Income
>
>
> >I have years of experience in trying to get bugs fixed in Omega products.
> >I've forwarded detailed documentation with numerous bugs along with
> specific
> >directions on how to reproduce the bugs. Omega TS ignored them. I sent
> >them to Bill Cruz and they were ignored. I complained publicly and
> >received one of BC's infamous calls where he tells the disgruntled user
> >that Omega loves them and promises to resolve the problems. Bill promised
> >to have his staff get on it if I would send another set to him. List
> >sent, bugs not fixed.
> New
> >version released, process repeated. Some years ago, prior to the release
> >of v4, the Omega list undertook a project to document bugs and essential
> >usability requests (e.g. projection space for future bars) and produced a
> >very comprehensive Word document which was sent to BC. To my knowledge,
> >BC didn't even acknowledge the effort. The problems with the latest
> >release
> are
> >just the latest saga in Quality Control problems which have plagued Omega
> >product releases. Not to mention the lack of Y2K compatibility in the
> >product line released just a couple of years ago for which Omega promised
> to
> >deliver fixes shortly after the TS5 product release which was promised
> >for 2Q 1998.
> >
> >I'm not willing to take the risks Mark takes either, however I suggest
> >that you are uninformed if you believe the positive, cooperative methods
> >which you espouse will actually produce concrete results. Omega's
> >business model is not oriented toward the existing user base. It is
> >geared toward sale of product to new users, most of whom will fail in
> >trading and then be shocked to find that they agreed to license terms
> >which prevent them from legally transferring the license in competition
> >with Omega's sales to new users.
> >
> >Earl
>
>
> Long time users of Omega List know Earl very well:
> He is a specialist of bitching and is not aTradetation user.
> He only owns a Supercharts version, and seems to not understand the
> subtilities of easy language.
> In his language, he calls this bugs an reports them to Omega, that opened
> a special dustbin for him ( big model).
>
> I have again replied to one of his stupid messages about a so called error
> that was very simple to explain with the maxbars back setting when using
> exponential averages.
>
> Also, he refers to an old documebt named Omegabug.doc, on which I have
> spent a lot of time to explain that there were a lot of bugs in the
> omegabug.doc document. But for bitching people, this is their bible. Thise
> interested may search in the archive all posts with bugs in omegabug.doc,
> under my name. None of the so called bugs that I demonstrated to be wrong
> were proven as true bugs after.
>
> This does not mean that TS2000i is free of errors or programming
> optimization needs, or things like this dueto the complexity of the
> software and Windows environment stangeness ( for example, Windows
> european versions and Windows 2000 products beta on the same machine).
> This is also the reason of the existence of service packs.
>
> Now, in a nutshell, when you see Earl Adamy as a contributor,you may store
> three types of messages: -Those promoting the state of art and well known
> software "ensign" -Those telling how ugly Omega is (and TS, and Bill Cruz
> and so on), their software bugged, and how the mistread the great
> supercharts programmer that he is. -Those explaining what is a difference
> with an alpha version and a beta version.
>
> To spare room on your HD, just keep one copy of each: It's enough, they
> all say the same.
>
> There is an exception: Sometime , when he is tired of bitching, he may
> produce some sounding good advices unrelated to the tree obsessional
> topics above. But seldom than never, and we may explain this by some
> fatigue rather than an habit.
>
> Unfortunately for us, most of the veeerrry active contributors (?) to this
> list are specialist of carbon copy of their own obsessions. Due to Earl's
> grand age, I'm seriously considering to write to the director of the
> geriatric section where he is supposed to live , and propose him to
> replace his Email account and Ensign / SC softare by a permanent access to
> Disney Channel. I suppose that after a few days to adapt , he will enjoy
> this more than trading related topics, and will spend a lot of time to
> write to Goofy and Donald Duck...
>
> Good for him, good for the normal readers of the list, after...
>
> (I rely on all of you to avoid to tell him that Disney's characters are
> not for real).
>
> Rgds,
>
> PO
>
>
>
|