[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Switch?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

They do offer delayed data for any exchange that the user doesn't want RT
data, just like QCom.  However, as of now they aren't offering the emini in
RT for free with the delayed data package, even though the exchange allows
this.  I just don't want to go through the hassle of signing up with them
(and cancel charges on my credit card if necessary...) if I can't compare
the emini to Qcom in RT without getting hit with exchange fees again.  I
don't think comparing the emini with one in RT and one delayed is a valid
way of doing it.  Hopefully they will soon take advantage of the free RT
data from the exchange and offer potential customers a truly free way to
evaluate it, just as Qcom does.  Anybody else using RT internet data should
encourage them to do this as well, the more competitors the better...

Bruce

----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Switch?


> Bruce, when you say "including exchange fees" does this mean that Nextrend
> does not provide delayed data for the exchanges to which you do not
> subscribe on a real-time basis? I've been running QCharts this month with
> the free real-time e-mini and all other exchanges available on a delayed
> base while I work off the rest of April with Signal On-Line where I have
> already paid exchange fees. This has been a very nice way to evaluate
> QChart/QFeed. My biggest beef with SOL was the lack of access to delayed
> data for exchanges to which I do not subscribe on real-time basis.
>
> Earl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BruceB <bruceb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Switch?
>
>
> >David, I recently contacted Nextrend about taking them up on their "10
day
> >trial," as it says on their homepage.  I currently use Quote.com and love
> >it, but Nextrend appears to have a lot of charting features QC doesn't.
> >They told me you basically have to sign up for a month of service
> (including
> >exchange fees) and they'll give you 10 days to evaluate the service...  I
> >pointed out to them that the CME allows data vendors to give realtime
emini
> >data for free, and that they should offer this to prospective customers
who
> >want to make a RT comparison without paying all the up front money.  They
> >said they would think about it.  You might want to contact them and ask
for
> >the same.
> >
> >Bruce
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 9:25 AM
> >Subject: Re: Switch?
> >
> >
> >> Have not compared the two. I just learned of  Nextrend a few days ago
> from
> >> another list member. The Nextrend service looks interesting however it
> >lacks
> >> the QFeed style linkage for 3rd party software (an absolute must for
me)
> >and
> >> it does not appear to implement the QCharts/QFeed Continuum server
> >> technology which does provide a very fast and reliable feed. Note that
> the
> >> Nextrend comparison charts should be taken with a big grain of salt
since
> >> the comparison to QCharts is clearly erroneous and I assume it is for
> >other
> >> services mentioned. Do keep in mind that these services are still in
> their
> >> infancy and should be checked carefully for suitability. For example,
> >> several of us who use QCharts/QFeed have found that the intraday data
is
> >of
> >> reasonably high quality but the EOD is of questionable quality.
> >>
> >> Earl
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Singerman <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>; List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 7:02 AM
> >> Subject: Re: Switch?
> >>
> >>
> >> >Have you done a comparison of Quote.com and Nextrend in terms of
> >> reliability
> >> >and speed?
> >> >
> >> >Thanks.
> >> >
> >> >David
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>