|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
David, I recently contacted Nextrend about taking them up on their "10 day
trial," as it says on their homepage. I currently use Quote.com and love
it, but Nextrend appears to have a lot of charting features QC doesn't.
They told me you basically have to sign up for a month of service (including
exchange fees) and they'll give you 10 days to evaluate the service... I
pointed out to them that the CME allows data vendors to give realtime emini
data for free, and that they should offer this to prospective customers who
want to make a RT comparison without paying all the up front money. They
said they would think about it. You might want to contact them and ask for
the same.
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Switch?
> Have not compared the two. I just learned of Nextrend a few days ago from
> another list member. The Nextrend service looks interesting however it
lacks
> the QFeed style linkage for 3rd party software (an absolute must for me)
and
> it does not appear to implement the QCharts/QFeed Continuum server
> technology which does provide a very fast and reliable feed. Note that the
> Nextrend comparison charts should be taken with a big grain of salt since
> the comparison to QCharts is clearly erroneous and I assume it is for
other
> services mentioned. Do keep in mind that these services are still in their
> infancy and should be checked carefully for suitability. For example,
> several of us who use QCharts/QFeed have found that the intraday data is
of
> reasonably high quality but the EOD is of questionable quality.
>
> Earl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Singerman <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>; List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 7:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Switch?
>
>
> >Have you done a comparison of Quote.com and Nextrend in terms of
> reliability
> >and speed?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >David
> >
>
>
|