|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Group:
I read where you guys document in some detail the various
problems and unacceptabe features of TS2000. Apparantly
folks are also unhappy with WOW. Can anyone explain why
it is also unacceptable for trading?
Chas
-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Adamy <eadamy@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: List-omega <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, April 02, 1999 7:39 AM
Subject: Re: OK, whats the alternatives???
>Take a look at Ensign www.ensignsoftware.com - available for DTN & BMI
(also
>Signal OnLine but don't recommend it), well supported, fast, 32 bit, Y2K
>compliant, ESPL for custom development. No e-mail signals though.
>
>Earl
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carl Oberman <swtrans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Thursday, April 01, 1999 9:09 PM
>Subject: OK, whats the alternatives???
>
>
>>i tried TS2000 and have come to the conclusion that this product has more
>>problems than i want to deal with. the main problem, is its a pig. the
>>pig thing probably cant be fixed by omega, thats disturbing.
>>
>>all i do is trade the spoos. so i collect spoo tick data, the bonds,
>>various indexes, etc. i dont use most of this info, but from time-to-time
>>reference it. my indicators are pretty simple and basic, and although i
>>backtest some stuff, its not that important to me either.
>>
>>about the only feature i like on ts2000 is the ability to email signals,
>>although i havent tested it (LOL, it probably doesnt work).
>>
>>what are the alternatives available to TS today??? id like to send this
>>back, but if there isnt another alternative i guess im stuck with this
>>mess. thanks
>>
>
>
|