|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
So far I installed TS2000i offline, after copying ts4.0 in a different
directory. I use TS 4.0 for realtime trading with Reuters datafeed and I'll
use ts2000 for daily analysis offline, until I'll see that there will be
less problems. On the same pc (400Mhz + 13 gigs and 128 megs) I have running
them w/o problems (for now!). But I'll keep ts4.0 in ANY case with the y2000
patch.
I'll subscribe csi data to feed my daily systems.
But is it possible, honestly, that no one tried to write a better software
than ts in all these years? I mean the Server is the most dreadful
experience I have ever had since you have to input a lot of thing to update
it. But I love TS anyway, it makes lots of things easier, how to make it
better?
To offer an alternative to windows, linux was written.
So is it possible to write in vba or with access, excel and so on something
that it is OPEN to all those that want to add something without killing the
system?
Is it possible that there are so many one man band firms in the world in a
so delicate environment like the trading arena? (I DO really respect them
all, please do not misunderstand me).
Silly questions, I know, but what would you do after reading all these mails
against ts (or the way it works) creating problems to customers that just
want to use this great product?
I remember when I coudn't afford to buy metastock (I was 17) and I was in
love with markets (I am still!!!): I used an Apple IIc (128k, no hd, floppy
of 700kbyte) and Appleworks 3.0 (does anyone remember the good Apple II
times there), and I input by hand daily data for 50 stocks a day. The
spreadsheet to print charts was able to give a result after 4 minutes of
calculation.
I know, other times, I could be romantic but no way to build an open
architecture that make the most of how windows is built? Any one out there
listening???
As doctor Fraser says... I'm listening
Regards to you all
Riccardo Ronco (London)
|