|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi: I'm an EOD user that relies on this program, but not on a tick by tick
basis .I get that from Quote.com. I pay the bucks, as well as real time
upgraders do, so I really don't like being relegated
to the "EOD zone. I don't need "liabilities" anymore than anyone else. Also I
don't like the reference to the marketing and development as being targeted to
us "EOD " users. Invest in the program as others did and draw your own
conclusions.
Paula
P.S. I hardly think most members of this group are EOD. If they were the
dialogue would be easier to follow.:)
fpi@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Although TS is a real-time program, it seems from the list response that
> the overwhelming number of users are strictly EOD. That would explain, from
> a marketing & development point of view, why perhaps, little concern was
> given for the real-time trader.
>
> While I'm all for improvements, I think at the very least, a major upgrade
> shouldn't be a step backwards so that those who need/use/depend upon the
> program the most, are left with more of a liability than an asset.
>
>
> Greetings Omega-listers:
>
> Is there ANYONE on the list who trades real-time, who has installed and
> tried TS2000i with a real-time feed, that is of the opinion or can answer
> the following questions:
>
> 1) TS2000i can reasonably be used to daytrade.
>
> 2) That TS2000i is an improvement, overall, from TS4, in terms of trading
> real-time. Or failing being an improvement, hasn't been made worse?
>
> 3) Does it take more clicks to bring up a chart?
>
> 4) Does it run slower in terms of bringing up a chart than TS4? (I called
> Omega on Friday & was told it runs faster).
>
> 5) Does it toss it's cookies more than TS4?
>
> Or, is it that the TS no longer stands for TradeStation, but for Total S--t?
>
> Although TS is a real-time program, it seems from the list response that
> the overwhelming number of users are strictly EOD. That would explain, from
> a marketing & development point of view, why perhaps, little concern was
> given for the real-time trader.
>
> While I'm all for improvements, I think at the very least, a major upgrade
> shouldn't be a step backwards so that those who need/use/depend upon the
> program the most, are left with more of a liability than an asset.
>
> Regards,
>
> FPI
|