|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi All:
I never want to be involved in a discussion between vendors and prospective
buyers.
However, since I've dealt with Mark, I can say DEFINITELY that he is an
extremely helpful and friendly person, and has helped me and answered all
my responses every time in the past.
Regards,
Wong
============================================================================
========
At 01:32 PM 03/07/99 -0600, you wrote:
>So in others words the free lookers didn't buy so you decided that wasn't
>good for you.
>You felt it better for the public to buy then be stuck with your indicator
>if they didn't like or couldn't use them. I see why you call it a business
>decision. Here's an idea if your satisfaction rate is 95.5 as you claim
>then offer a money back offer during a limited trial period and have a 100%
>satisfaction rate.
>
>Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>>I can understand your concern about there being no free trials. I'd be
>suspect as well. Years ago we did offer it and discovered that free trial
>testers were not willing spend the time to "unlearn" old habits gathered
>from using lagging indicators, and learn new ways to apply low-lag signals.
> For example, a common first-approach toward creating a MACD with JMA is to
>use it for both the fast and slow crossover lines as follows:
>>
>>MyMACD = JRC.JMA(close,6,0) - JRC.JMA(close,30,0);
>>
>>However, the result is mediocre. This is because MACD actually *requires*
>lag, but only *between* the two crossing lines. Therefore, for best
>results, it's better that the slower line have as both lag and momentum so
>that it does not weaken when price reverses. Otherwise, the crossover is
>delayed as the faster line tries to meet the slower one (which is turning
>away). A simple moving average has more lag and momentum than JMA. So a
>better MACD would be as follows:
>>
>>MyMACD = JRC.JMA(close,6,0) - average(close,30);
>>
>>Learning when and where to add or remove lag in technical indicators takes
>time, and we found that during a brief trial period, the user is not
>committed to making the effort, and thus may decide JMA is not much better
>than what he already has.
>>
>>We realize that having no free trials will discourage some from acquiring
>our software, and that's OK. To help in the decision making process, our
>web site displays numerous charts that point out JMA's advantages, and
>posts a large collection of letters from users. We also try to provide
>quality tech support (within reason).
>>
>>All in all, we're happy to have a user satisfaction rate better than 99.5%
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Mark Jurik
>>Jurik Research
>>http://www.jurikres.com
>>
>
>
>
|