|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
fyi
TJ
---tj <trade_jack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> i admit it. i was a tradelab shill early on, mainly to goad french
> pete and other omega shills :)) but that changed since the snowbird
> conference in oct 98.
>
> i find it very interesting that we've heard nothing from the
> conference attendees (except for mb); neither good, bad, nor ugly
> regarding the conference, or the tradelab demo at the conference.
>
> the big question is "why!!!" what are you guys hiding? your
> embarassment, perhaps, for being played the "mark"? if not, then why
> the big silence on tradelab? i find that remarkable and puzzling from
> such a gregarious group as this. also, why weren't any of you guys
> asked to beta test tradelab? that smacks of concealment and conspiracy
> typical from scammers. now i don't know brickey from bookends, but
> honest guys don't do these things.
>
> i, for one, would like these questions answered before plunking down
> any more money on more endless beta trading software. this weirdness
> from professionals bothers me.
>
> another problem i have with tradelab is with payment plan. it sucks.
> here's the options we've got right now:
>
> ensign windows for $30/month open end lease, or
>
> ts5 for $495 upgrade, or
>
> metastock for $995 competitive upgrade, or
>
> wow i-net daytrader for $1450 competitive upgrade, or
>
> tradelab for $1750 upfront + $150/quarter + some flakey discussion
> list come on
>
> i hate to say it, but for my money, the first two make sense now in
> terms of price and market interia. don't underestimate ensign, that
> sucker has been around longer that ts, and it has a powerful
> programming language to boot, and customer support is second to none.
>
> TJ
>
> you've got to agree, mark's got a point!!!
>
>
> ---Mark Brown <markbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The following is a statement that is not in favor of Bob Brickey...
|