|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I swear to you if you look in the Omega List archives I recall being
challenged by someone mid 97 about this very issue and it was CPQ. I
remember I made a presentation to someone in the office and this was one of
the stocks in a list of 120 that they wanted test on. I run the test and
didn't check the charts and when I handed them all out they started laughing
because it had this Sea Food company instead. There were others but the Sea
Food I distinctly remember. I posted that here back then on the Omega List
and copied the email to Mitch. So it is something that they have known
about since mid 97... MB
>
>Omega's response 12/22/98:
>
>Dear Customer,
>
>We are aware of the problem and are working to correct this as quickly as
>possible.
>
>Our apologies for the inconvenience and thank you for your patience.
>
>Omega Research, Inc.
>Customer Support
>____________________________________________________________
>
>My best guess --assuming that the "fish" story is accurate-- is that the
new
>direct feed that BMI is transmitting directly from the exchanges includes
>Toronto Stocks, where the old feed (from Bridge, or whomever) didn't
include
>Toronto. Would be nice if it were possible to filter out the Canadian
fish...
>_______________________________________________________________
>
>At 06:05 PM 12/22/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>Well I have been following cpq for 6 or 7 years or so and this has never
>>happened like this on any of the versions of ts that I remember. The only
>>thing that I know of that has changed in the last month or so, is that BMI
>>went from third party to direct transmission of data, so it is extremely
>>doubtful that Omega is to blame. Just like the news groups it is much
>>easier to blame somebody else when someone complains about anything. ie
>>vendors blame software, software blames hardware and hardware blames
>>everybody.
>>
>>----------
>>> From: J. Rodney Grisham <grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: Omega Research, Tech Support <techsupp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: Errors in CPQ data
>>> Date: Tuesday, December 22, 1998 4:58 PM
>>>
>>> I suppose this is a TS 5 fix, or do we dare hope for a fix
>>> in TS 4? When will this be fixed? In what version will it
>>> be fixed?
>
>
>
|