PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dans un courrier daté du 15/12/98 06:38:19 Heure d6iver Pari19 Madrid,
wieringa@xxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>
> I'm curious why do you defend OR so much?
>
Old habits on this list.
Do not worry, I'm a special case as biased as one could be.
I'm a contrarian, you know...(g)
> I'm not one to bash pointlessly, but in my opinion, there product is very
> unprofessional for the cost. There is no excuse the _huge_ omissions I
see.
>
OK
This is possible.
Could you give us an example of an existing trading platform with the same
features than Omega, that is more professional for the cost?
None found ?
So, no compaison possible for the moment.
> If they put out an incomplete product they should advertise it as such.
> But no, they advertise it as "Easy" and powerful and the best thing since
> sliced bread. Maybe inexperienced computer people are impressed, but I am
> not.
>
Easy Language id not difficult for simple things.
For difficult concepts, it is not so easy, but I do not think that they waid
that easy language is easy for anything ( You will need to upgrade to Miracle
Language, still not available).
> From the little exposure I've had to TradeLab, they seem much more
> professional. If so, it should turn out to be a good wakeup call for OR.
>
Yes.
The important words are "they seem".
"They are" is maybe right.
But they need to prove that they are better with their documentation, when
released.
Sincerely,
Pierre Orphelin
|