[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BMI and Bandwith??!!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I received an identical response. I agree about the bogus excuse of
bandwidth. Too many of us have indicators/systems that can't function w/out
it ("TestSym"). Now I'm wondering are there other data services that have a
similar timing symbol that we can substitute (assuming our indicator/system
code developers are willing to make the change)? A core component of my
daytrading approach has just gone out the window. If we can make such a
substitution, perhaps it'll lead a migration away from BMI & its callous
treatment of its customers.

Michael



At 07:14 PM 12/14/98 -0500, David Candle wrote:
>To help the group I wrote in. This was my response to BMI. 
>Thats hogwosh. The amount of bandwith it takes up is super minimal. 
>At 03:52 PM 12/14/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>>	Dear Mr. Candle,
>>
>>	Thank you for your patience for my response.  I am afraid that the
>>decision has been made to not re-instate the "TestSym".  The BTCI2F is the
>>symbol that you will have to use at this time.  Providing timely and
>>accurate data is foremost.  Having a symbol which provides information at
>>one time a minute (BTCI2F) as opposed to five times a minute (TestSym), it
>>was decided that the symbol taking up less bandwidth was the way to go.
>>
>>	Please send further questions, comments or concerns to tsbmi@xxxxxxx
>>
>>	Sincerely,
>>	Ray Bamer
>>	BMI Client Services
>>	tsbmi@xxxxxxx
>>	Direct 800.436.4036 choice #2
>>	Fax 510.266.6060
>>http:/www.bmiquotes.com
>
>
>