|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
HEAR! HEAR!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Deming <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List Posts <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, 24 October, 1998 7:18
Subject: Purpose of Omega List
>>> Pierre's correct: if all we do is continue to complain TO THE LIST...we
>>> should all sign up for psychiatric assistance. I think Bill Cruz
>>> figured out long ago that if that's all we did then we'd be
>>> "well-contained" and, hence, no "real" problem. He's absolutely right.
>>>
>>> Time to break out of the box.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>OK.
>>Go out of the box and explain all of this to the Court.
>>This is not the purpose of this list doing no more than lobbying.
>
>
>I agree with Pierre. This list is becoming nothing more than a whine and
>complain list. The list used to be a forum where we could help newbies,
>brain storm, share ideas, and offer solutions to ELA programming problems.
>Many fine add on products and system concepts have emerged from ideas and
>needs expressed on the list. Many people have received value from list
>participation.
>
>We all know that (1) Omega has a law suit filed against it, (2) Some
>customers are really PO'd at Omega for various reasons, (3) Customers want
a
>Y2K patch for 4.0, (4) TS4 has some problems, (5) There may be some new
>charting packages released including WOW, TradeLabs, and TS5.0. All of
which
>are currently under development.
>
>There, that should summarize the activity on the list for the past 6
months.
>Now can we get back to the intention of the list.
>
>I am happy with TS, it's the best that's currently available (yes, even
with
>it's problems). It's not perfect, but no software program ever is. In fact,
>you can be sure that WOW and TradeLabs (if ever completed and released)
will
>also have their fair share of problems.
>
>I trade profitably with TS and feel others can too with a lot of work and
>persistance. My systems could not have been developed without the TS
>platform, it's a critical tool for system development.
>
>I'd like to suggest the people dissatisfied with Omega TS leave the Omega
>list and let the rest of us make the best of what we have with TS4.0.
>
>
|