|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have to disagree with you, Bob. Since Ron went off topic first (I do not
view myself as a Clinton hater; ALL politicians are scum, IMO), I feel he
owes the list an apology. The best thing would be for him to keep his
politcal opinions private and not subject the list to this kind of abuse.
I think you are wrong to attack fletch and TJ. I find your implication that
they waited for a post to come along to attack ridiculous! What attack? I
see no personal attack on Ron, only a slam on Clinton. Given Ron's
previous history of attacking others on this list, he should be able to
take a joke too! If Ron had not thrown in his "humorous??" aside on the
presidential penis, then this discussion would not be necessary. He clearly
wanted provoke an exchange to advance his pro-Clinton agenda. This has
been clear from his past pro-Clinton comments.
If we cannot discuss religion on this list, then politics should be taboo
too. As we descend into the political election season, I and others do not
want to see this list devolve into a purely political forum for those
wanting to promote their activist agendas. Politics, AWA opinions, are
worthless.
-Tony Haas
>At 01:47 AM 10/17/98 -0500, Robert W Cummings wrote:
>Well like I said originally it was a subject about Fed cutting that went
off subject >between to list members. Its Friday the end of a long trading
week. Nothing more >than two people finishing a conversation. What was
meant to a complimentary >view of the hypocrisy of politics, politicians
for both countries were they live. That >post is about 5 hours old then you
come in and jump down Ron's throat and
>I'm wondering if that's more harmful than the any post. Now Trade Jack
>joins in with personal attacks toward Ron. Seems to me you and Trade Jack
>owe Ron an apology as he was just minding his own business until this came
>up and he was attacked.
>
>Robert
>
>
>
>fletch wrote:
>>lets' get something straight !
>>
>>- when does an " organ " have anything to do with the Fed cut ???
>>and - getting spammer like below is not subject material or is it !
>>
>>And if it is not - why was " it " not sent THRU the LIST ???? kinda self -
>>explanatory wouldn't you say !!!
>>
>>Subject:
>> Re: FED cut forewarning
>> Date:
>> 16 Oct 1998 18:53:09 -1000
>> From:
>> Ron Augustine <RonAug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To:
>> fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxx>
>>
>>Sorry to see that you don't seem to have a sense of humor today-- but,
>>what's a "mud-hen" & a "banty rooster"???
>>
>>And, your term "TA" -- are you referring to TITS & ASS ? :)
>>
>>
>>and btw - Robert !!!- i have been reading posts on this list for quite a
>while
>>- don't recall reading crap
>>like the above or his previous post re his angled speech ! but that's
>all-right-
>>isn't it !!
>>so - you do what you have to....
>>
>>but since you mentioned it - who is more full of shit ?- ron or the
>christmass
>>tree ? and oh i forgot - wherever he goes you soon follow - hey i'm
>impressed
>>!!!!
>>
>>later dude
>>
>>
>>Robert W Cummings wrote:
>>
>>> We meaning the people living in the US and not Fletches opinion as I read
>>> it. This is only a portion of what was said and stemmed from a previous
>>> conversation about the unexpected cut in rates by the Fed. Trading events
>>> like the Fed cutting rates are very relate to this list. Sometimes
subjects
>>> can seemed to get off subject and do at times but that's okay it
happens on
>>> any list. What doesn't happen is somebody going through all the day's post
>>> then picking one to attack. That does more harm to this list than somebody
>>> getting off subject.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> , fletch wrote:
>>> >ah ! excuse me !!! what's this " we " sh*t ? speak for yourself
>>> ....
>>> >.......since " when " does a " mud-hen " & a " banty rooster "
>>> have
>>> >spit to do with TA ???
>>> >
>>> >btw - weren't you " warned " by sheriff chuck about the politcal
crap !
>>> >
>>> >fletch
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Ron Augustine wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> As you probably know, we here in the U.S. are concerned with more
>important
>>> >> issues like Monica and where the President's penis has been (or where
>its
>>> >> going next) and whether or not the Clinton haters will be successful in
>>> >> their attempt at a coup d'ι·tat -- :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
|