[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: We were right again blah blah



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I couldn't care less who's opinion it was.
I see you're feeding us yet another opinion. Shall we go short right now
then? If you're right that's great. If your're wrong, who will remember.
Has anyone ever made money by following opinions of others? Maybe by
accident. I'm sure most opinion-seekers have lost.

Neal, I know you're a great guy and you're trying to be helpful. But this
opinion stuff hits a sore spot, I'm sorry. I'd rather not see it cluttering
up the list. Now, that's more than enough about this!

At 12:57 PM 10/14/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Hold the phone guys. I merely passed on someone else's opinion. It was not
>mine. It was Tom Peterson's. He will not be posted on this list again. I
>thought a discussion might be valuable or we can get back to which, witch
>doctor has the best indicator or system and how and what server works best.
>In short, let us all fiddle as we watch the stock market go down another
>15%.
>For those of you who are interested in courses contact carcc101@xxxxxxxx He
>offers some free basic futures and options courses and he is a former member
>of the Merc and teaches with me from time to time. Thanks for your time and
>patience. Again, Tom is gone, kaput.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Lane <logical@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 9:13 AM
>Subject: Re: We were right again blah blah
>
>
>>At 11:05 AM 10/14/98 EDT, you wrote:
>>>I dont think Neal is looking for clients.
>>>Some guys like Neal are different than the Bullshit, Bolt guys etc.
>>>I dont agree with some of his postings ,  but well ........
>>>
>>
>>So what WOULD be the point of these "we were right" postings? People could
>>lose a lot of money trading based on this BS. Like this morning. I feel
>>sorry for all the worshipers who sold this morning based on this post.
>>
>>Do you think he will make a "we were wrong" posting? Hmm... Maybe if he
>>doesn't I will.
>>
>>I think it should be exposed for what it is, and that is self-serving CRAP.
>>
>
>
>