|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Sorry, I didn't read the date carefully enough. <face glows red> I have 5362
ticks for 10/9/98 but that includes all ticks from the close 10/8/98 I don't
know how to get the # of ticks from any one session (except the first session -
before the 2nd starts)
Alan
hans esser wrote:
> if you have MORE than me - WE know that I have MISSED some ?
> if I have MORE than you - WE know that you have MISSED some ?
>
> next question ?
>
> rgds hans
>
> > Okay, I can see how many ticks there are, but how do you know how many
> > there should be?
> >
> > hans esser wrote:
> >
> > > > How do you determine that there are missing ticks? What standard do
> > > > you judge it against? I have BMI data and it never occured to me that
> > > > there would be missing ticks.
> > > >
> > > > Alan
> > >
> > > go to intraday chart (e.g. SP z8)
> > >
> > > righ click
> > >
> > > EDIT PRICE DATA
> > > (tells you at the bottom/left how many ticks you have for that symbol)
> > >
> > > SPz8 10/09/98 on DBC/eutelsat I have 2530 ticks for that day - AND YOU
> > > ???
> > >
> > > usually BMI has 1% more (with normal weather), is faster and cheaper -
> > > AND MUCKING NOT AVAILABLE IN EUROPE - otherwise would have it aswell
> > >
> > > - ususally TENFORE has 10% less
> > >
> > > - german BIS datafeed usually has 30% less <g>
> > >
> > > rgds hans
> > >
> > >
> > > > hans esser wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Can anyone please recommend a reliable data feed in the UK?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which is better DBC or Tenfore?
> > > > >
> > > > > DBC is better
> > > > >
> > > > > Tenfore is cheaper and delivers LESS ticks,
> > > > > e.g. missing 10% and more on S&P future
> > > > >
> > > > > rgds hans
> > > >
> >
|