|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Charles Wright <redeemed10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Dear Dark:
>
>You wrote:
>>
>> If you assume that what is seen *must* have been created.
>
>Yes, I assume that. Chaos will not produce order.
>
>
>> Faith can be mislead just as easily. Indeed the computer programmer
>> who KNEW he wrote the program correctly was using more faith than
>> reason to rationalize his program's correctness.
>
>Faith does not mislead. It cannot, any more than walking can get you
>lost. What matters is the object of your faith -- if it is false, it
>will mislead; internal duplicity will also mislead, regardless of the
>object of your faith.
>
>I don't understand the statement "...using faith more than reason to
>rationalize...". To RATIONalize requires the use of reason. The
>point was that, regardless of one's use of the reasoning process, he
>can arrive at a false conclusion if his premises are incorrect,
>dishonest, or irrelevant. Even an atheist can truly believe he has
>done something correctly and yet find out at the conclusion that his
>results are way off his expectations. In fact, I think even
>objectivist programmers also debug...If reason is infallible, why?
>
> ...blah, blah, blah......blah, ...blah ...... blah...
>
Why are you people of faith so demanding of proof ??
(No replies - this was just a snide remark.)
donc
|