PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tony:
I take no insult in anything you said. And I'll say it again...I am not an Omega
hater. But I will not be taken advantage of. I beta test many products for many
electronic trading related firms, I participate heavily in many on-line groups,
I know many educators in this business and you can bet I am going to raise some
hell about TradeStation current versions not being year 2000 compliant and Omega
being unwilling to listen to its users in this matter. And as we've seen in the
past few days, we can now add more bugs to this list.
I'm not alone out here. I know many of you want your existing product to be
supported--This is only fair. Use all your resources and demand that Omega takes
care of its existing clients. I'm going to use mine to put some media pressure
on them....
I don't want an email from them. I want a year 2000 compliant patch for my
existing program. And I want it now. After all...Bill Clinton and the US
government may be compliant before Omega, if Omega continues at this rate.
Tim Morge [Still saving old paper bags-ready for year 2000 hand-charting]
sptradr@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> tim wrote:
> >As I said, I am not examing TS version 5.0 until I have a patch for my TS
> >version 4.0 that is year 2000 compliant, is compatible with the new stock
> feed
> >increments and now has code fixing this initial bad tick bug--I'll be
> >hand-drawing charts on paper bags if I have to, but I won't spend another
> dime
> >for Omega products until these issues are addressed and fixed ON EXISTING
> >VERSIONS.
> >
> >We have the power here, folks. Demand they fix existing versions. For
> those of
> >you out there sneering about one person not having any power, you'd be amazed
> >how many people each of us interacts with in our professions. And if
> >TradeStation users demand a fix and then become vocal in this industry, we'll
> >get the fix.
>
> I have been demanding a Y2K bug fix for TS 4.0 for over 9 months. Janette
> Perez, Bill Cruz's PR mouthpiece/puppet, has stated for the record that
> there will be no Y2K bug fix for TS 4.0 until the TS 5.0 Pro-Suite products
> are released. If the release of the entire "suite" is implied or required,
> then we may not see a Y2K bug fix until 1999.
>
> Your perceived power over Omega is illusionary. Bill Cruz will blow you
> off as surely as he has everyone else who have raised these questions,
> labelling you as another "Omega basher". In Omega's universe, you are
> nothing more than a small squeaky wheel. Don't get me wrong, I'm on your
> side. But the Omega juggernaut cares for no one once they got your money
> in hand. Ask those who paid for the TS 3.5 upgrade and had to wait 2 years
> to get it.
>
> I see no choice but filing a class action lawsuit against Omega should they
> continue to backpedal on the Y2K bug fix and push it back to 1999. Perhaps
> a large legal stick to the Omega's nose will get their attention. If not,
> then pass me a brown paper bag.
>
> -Tony Haas
|