PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
FutureSource is a pain to use with TS. They have their own ugly DOS
interface Server instead of using Omega's Server. Their box is bigger. They
took longer to recover from the G4 mess than BMI, and BMI satellite is every
bit as fast as anything out there.
Also, remember FutureSource was not on the list of supported data feeds in
Omega's press release.
And FutureSource is more expensive.
And BMI is just as clean.
And if you wanted to look at a measly delayed quote of some stocks you are
also watching, you can't do it with FutureSource.
Other than that, you may want to look at FutureSource. (But I wouldn't)
; )
Neil
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Robert W Cummings [mailto:robertwc@xxxxxxxxxx]
| Sent: Saturday, June 20, 1998 11:28 PM
| To: TomKochik@xxxxxxx
| Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: Re: FUTURE SOURCE ?
|
|
| Thomas
|
| I asked them and they told me they give clean data and thats why
| they cost
| more nothing was said about speed. I personally had the
| opportunity to time
| BMI against Signal and the results were amazing at how slow Signal was
| against BMI, but I can't say about Futures Source on speed or on anything
| other than what they told me.
|
| Robert
|
|
|
|
| At 05:21 PM 6/20/98 EDT, TomKochik@xxxxxxx wrote:
| >Hello, Could someone explain to me what actually the Future
| Source does (is
| >being the vendor of data ok, but do I need it If I want to buy
| Super Charts
| >??? and probably planning to get the BMI or DTN (IF supported)
| as A DATA FEED
| >??
| >
| >
| >Just trying to see whats the real advantage of having the
| Future Source as a
| >data vendor ??
| >
| >thanks
| >
| >Thomas CA
| >
| >
| >
|
|