[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Letter to Neal Weintraub re Mark's letter



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Peter,

I'd like to second what you have said.  There will always be limitations
and bugs to software.  The Omega product I use SuperCharts V.4.0 is
extremely useful for my purposes. But where I find something I can't do
with it I am not mortally defeated or enraged at Omega.  I guess where you
can complain about Omega is their Monopolistic Approach to business - scam
artists I do not think they are.

I am sure most people realize there will always be gray areas in trading
and nothing is ever perfect and software is but a tool.

David Hunt
http://adest.com.au


----------
| From: Peter 2150 <Peter2150@xxxxxxx>
| To: Omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: Letter to Neal Weintraub re Mark's letter
| Date: Saturday, April 18, 1998 11:22 AM
| 
| Hi Group
| 
|         Since some that Mark Browns comments to Neal Weintraub were worth
| posting here and implied that Omega was running a boiler room scam, I
wrote
| Neal Weintraub a letter commenting.  Thought I'd post it here.
| 
|                                     Pete
| 
| Neal
| 
|         I am writing because I saw a post of Mark's refering to Omega's
boiler
| room marketing.  In turns of cleaning up the industry from scam artists,
yes
| there are a bunch, but I have a hard time fitting Omega into that
category.  I
| use Tradestation 3.5 and have been very happy with it.  I have 4.0 in the
| closet, but haven't yet bothered with the update.  The only thing I can
see at
| all and I know its what Mark is upset about, is that one of there big
selling
| points is the *system* features, which sort of imply one can automate
trading.
| I'd like to comment on this, but if there is something else they are
doing I'd
| be curious what it is.
| 
|          Yes they sell system's ability, and yes Mark is right there are
| problems from a perfectionist view point.  But whoever uses a tool, be it
a
| hammer, computer, software, whatever, must must must understand his
tools.   I
| have worked a lot with large scientific computers, complex oil field
| processing software, and PC's since their inception.   My experience
leads me
| to several truths as related to Tradestation or any other program.
| 
| 1.  Any Easy Language program writen potentially contains bugs.
| 2.  Easy Language and Tradestation contain bugs, because all software
does.
| 
|      I repeat - all software probably contains bugs.
| 
| 3.  Hardware can cause error's.  Aside from the hoopla about the famous
Intel
| Pentium bugs, I have actually seen math error's occur and get worse as
| hardware
| degenerates.
| 
| 4.  Data can be bad.
| 
|          All of these are problems the trader using any software, and
hardware
| needs to be aware of so he needs to monitor his system, and make sure
signals
| make sense.  This is the price of having these tools.
| 
|      I know Mark would say Omega is aware of these bugs and has ignored
them.
| Well maybe, but I worked more a major Oil Field Service company, which
wrote
| all its own software.  Many times serious bugs were found, but it just
wasn't
| economical to find and fix them, and they didn't.  Be no doubt that Omega
and
| any other company, faces those same decisions.  It would do us no good to
have
| Omega or any company make the decision to try and stamp out all bugs and
the
| cost of product development, and have them go out of business.  There is
a
| real world reality.   Yes there are problems with Tradestation, but I
can't
| buy anything else as good for the money, soo..
| 
|            Neal I'd be curious about your thoughts on this.   Meanwhile
there
| are plenty of solution providers, who really are scam artists sucking in
the
| traders.  Go get those guys.
| 
|                                      Pete 
|