[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: JIM COX Realtime Trading



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I don't know what Jim's real motives were or are, and I don't know
what led up to this thread.  All I can go on is what I read to date. 

Based on that, all I can say is Jim don't be discouraged and don't
descend to the level of being like those who may (or may not) be
"dickheads"; remember name calling is the last resort, although I
know it can be REALLY frustrating, especially when you may have
started with really good intentions.  But someone who may be
getting on your nerves, can be also saying something valid - not
always or even often, I know.  And in the final analysis only the 
track record counts.

Anyhow, by placing yourself under public examination, in putting
your money and results where your mouth is, will soon separate 
the wheat from chaff, especially realtime. So many systems are
"perfect" in labs and in hindsight on historical data, only to
disintegrate in real life and when faced with predicting the future!

If I can ever get this stupid PC log into IRC, I'll be having look
at your results and then decide who may be a Bullsh..artist.  Wish
there were more who submitted themselves and their systems
to more objective testing - but then don't forget to share!!!  I still
think there is much more art, than just mechanics to all this.

Regards, Karl.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jim Cox [SMTP:cayenne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:	Thursday, 16 April 1998 10:49
To:	omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: JIM COX Realtime Trading

At 08:47 PM 4/15/98 -0700, you wrote:
>At 09:40 PM 4/15/98, Jim Cox wrote:
>> (OK, one
>>of the original (circa 1994) indicators was based on a truncated RSI, it
>>was only a small part of Bullseye.
>
>That was the point I was making. That the original Bullseye was just a
>slightly modified RSI and I'm so glad to see you now admit that. 

>
	Blah Blah Blah>

	What I said, was part of the the original Bullseye, circa 1994, was based
on a truncated RSI. Only part of it. It changed since then.


	OK? The rest of the methodology has nothing to do with Welles Wilder or
whomever!!

	That's the point!