[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Exasperated!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

When Dial Data has bad data for A/D, NH/NL, I will often check the Wall
Street Journal website (wsj.com) and correct dial/data this way. I've also
tried several EOD data vendors and if it's not this, it's something else
that they will not agree on. 

http://interactive.wsj.com/edition/resources/documents/diaries.htm

Either way, it's probably a good idea to have 2+ sources for data. (1
internet and 1 direct connection) in case of trouble.

That solved it for me.

Carlos Lourenco




----------
> From: DPoiree <DPoiree@xxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Exasperated!
> Date: Monday, April 06, 1998 7:52 AM
> 
> I'm exasperated!
> 
> In my quest for ACCURATE end of day data for NYSE advancing issues,
declining
> issues, new highs new lows, S&P 500, and the Dow, I now subscribe to
three
> data vendors,(Traders Access, Dial Data, Quotes Plus), and I check the
NYSE
> web site for data.
> 
> Imagine this, none of the four seem to agree on the numbers, (at least
not
> the adv, dec, NH, NL)!
> 
> I'll spare you all the needless details. My questions are: 
> 
> 1) How does one get accurate data?
> 
> 2) How does one know that the data is correct?
> 
> 3) Can anyone explain why there are so many "opinions" of what the
numbers
> are?
> How do the data vendors come up with these bogus numbers that are
supposed to
> be "the most accurate in the industry"? Random number generators? If they
are
> all supposed to report the same number, why aren't they the same? How
does it
> get messed up?
> 
> Thanks for any insight.
> 
> Dan Poiree
> Bellingham WA
>