|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Jay,
I think the "TD" in front is part of his/their Trademark,as many
others have taken his earlier ideas,and incorporated them into their
own High Priced code.
I have no connection with td,and all the mumbo jumbo,-except that a
family member was at one of his taped seminars.
Jay Mackro wrote:
>
> At 01:02 AM 3/29/98 -0800, Tom Cathey wrote:
>
> >A friend of mine called me tonight to get me to read something in March,
> >1998, Futures magazine.
> >After looking it over, it appears something has apparently changed. <g>
> >They were really a good mag years ago.
> >
> snip...At this point, Tom cited numerous silly/misleading ads that
> appeared in recent issues of Futures
>
> One more I'd like to add to Tom's list:
>
> Is anyone else getting torqued off at the stupid articles - er, I mean
> infomercials - from Tom DeMark and T.J. DeMark that have appeared in
> the past several issues of Futures? I suspect that the DeMarks are
> competent technical analysts - my point is NOT that their methods are
> flawed. My point is that from the articles, there is no way of knowing
> WHAT their methods are! Everything refers you to their stupid,
> proprietary indicators, all of which, embarassingly enough, are named
> "TD - something" (some psychiatrist could have a field day analyizing
> someone with a need to attach his initials to everything).
>
> Of course, DeMark is one of Futures Magazine's "poster boys" - on
> p. 57 of the January issue, there is an ad from the "Futures Learning
> Center" for a $69 DeMark video, and in past issues I'm sure I have
> seen full-page ads for his indicators.
>
> C'mon Futures - either put such infomercials in the classified
> section, or else run articles that fully explain the author's methods.
> The DeMark's monthly series, with nothing but references to "TD-this"
> and "TD-that" are blatantly come-ons for their products, and have zero
> value to the trader who refuses to buy their stuff.
>
> Jay Mackro
|