|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Tom Cathey a écrit:
> ----------
>
>
> Hi Gwenn -
>
> I would normally continue the discussion off the list, but perhaps others
> are interested or can help too.
>
> Now.... I think you're right about the "for verifying the veracity of your
> intellectual findings" but...I'm not sure what you mean about "instead of
> for buying and selling a great many number of times in total ignorance of
> the outcome"
>
Don't consider trades individually but the mass of your trades. Each one is
basically random, but their series reflects your own input. When you shoot at a
target, you don't look at the dust on the end of your barrel but the target.
Here as well you don't look at each trade as it goes, but at the evolution of
those as a target that is met or not.
> IE...I almost feel that being intellectually correct about a trade is
> enough of a reward....and the money aspect just contaminates the sport of
> it.....THAT is a real problem if we want to be in it to make money <g>
>
See my other post.
> I almost think (who was that guy?) it's true that we all get what we want
> from the markets....maybe just trying to solve its mysteries is what really
> turns me on....cheezz
>
Ed Seykota. Also my other post. I think the "intellectual thing" you described
here is your parts invention to serve as hionorable excuse in place of the true
reasons. See my other post. But nevertheless, you do not have to change
anything, if you feel comfortable with that. Do inquire only if you feel a lack
of balance here, which would be the case if the question is regularly on your
mind.
Yours,
Gwenn
> Any suggesions on curing this problem?
>
> Thanks -
>
> Tom Cathey
|