[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OmegaWorld comes to you free?


  • To: The Code <veeger2001@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: OmegaWorld comes to you free?
  • From: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 13:24:31 -0800 (PST)
  • In-reply-to: <19980314201812.15344.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

The Code

don't you  know  - took............... Dorothy only two clicks of her heels, an immediate
declaration of "expert" status, some written testimonials and a little PR.

btw - there is only one person on this list who writes code this way....hm!.  Seems the
."The Phoenix"  has well.....risen?

regards to "The Code Man" and his voice of freedom -  stagflation will surely destroy us all


fletch

The Code wrote:

> I just saw an add in my new Stock and Commodities magazine for
> OmegaWorld. I saw that registration was a meager $895.00 a bargain when
> you consider the education you'll receive would normally cost thousands
> of dollars! <Quoting them of course. The ad goes on to say that you will
> walk away with 101 system trading ideas. From over 40 industry experts!
> Now I want to know what it takes to be an industry expert? At least they
> were careful enough not to misrepresent themselves as real traders. That
> may have caused even more legal troubles than Omega is in now. I wonder
> how many of those experts can provide public proof  (real money trading
> ) of their so-called success? I wonder what makes Omega think they are
> qualified to pick who is an industry leader and who is not? I'm jealous
> I want to be an industry expert too. I wonder if I could give away at
> least 1001 system trading ideas on this list before they have their
> conference on May 1-3, 1998 for free?
>
> Ps for those that don't know, if a concept or system was ever published
> or talked about in public it becomes public domain. <That's a period
> there. If some one is smart enough to take the talk or print and put it
> into code they are not a thief or in violation of crap! Well maybe in
> violation of exposing it doesn't work quite as well as it was
> represented to. As I said before the vendors are the thieves and this
> industry is being overrun by flim flam scammers. That is what they are
> no matter how personable, polite or congenial they are.