[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Priorities



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

As I remember; you can't have R & D without Sales and Marketing first.  

----------
> From: taracent <taracent@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Priorities
> Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 6:50 PM
> 
> taracent wrote:
> > 
> > Dennis Holverstott wrote:
> > >
> > > I think a couple of lines from the recently posted financial
statement
> > > tell the story about why there are so many unhappy campers.
> > >
> > >                          Three Months Ended              Year Ended
> > >                              December 31,                December 31,
> > >                          1997           1996          1997         
1996
> > > Product development    540,076        342,474     1,890,392   
1,041,131
> > > Sales and marketing  3,291,973      1,472,205    11,272,290   
5,617,931
> > >
> > 
> > Dennis,
> > 
> > This is amazing, that Omega spent only 1.9 million of new Product
> > development and 11.3 million on sales and marketing for the year.  Is
> > there something wrong with this picture?  We call all see why release 5
> > is behind schedule.  Maybe they should move some of those marketing
> > types from sales to programming, lock them in a room, and tell them NOT
> > to come out until a release 5 and a Y2K product fix is completed.
> > 
> > Someone's comment about attempting to sell this to large firms is
> > correct, they will not buy anything these days that is not Y2K
> > compliant.  With this fact in hand, version 4 is a dead duck because
> > they won't touch it because of the Y2K problem.  Now we see why all of
> > the money is being spent on marketing, to sell version 4 to the general
> > "DUMB" public.
> > 
> > I hope they deliver the version 5 before they go under.  Given their
> > stock performance over the last few months, the financial markets are
> > not impressed with their results.  I hope that they are a better
> > software firm than they are stock performance firm.
> > 
> > R Tareilo
>