|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Can anyone help? I have two PCs (Alpha &
Gamma) running the same app i.e. Office Pro 97.<BR><BR>Both have 32MB of ram.
Alpha is 100 Mhz Pentium running Win95; Gamma is IBM<BR>PR200 Mhz running Win95b
(OSR2).<BR><BR>Opening 'test.csv' (475KB) on Alpha takes about 10 secs; on Gamma
5 secs.<BR><BR>Closing test.csv on Alpha takes 1 sec; on Gamma this simple
operation takes<BR>10 secs. Also closing the application takes 10 seconds, when
there is nothing to save.<BR><BR>I have tried reinstalling both Win95b and
Office Pro 97 but the problem<BR>persists.<BR><BR>What on earth can be stopping
the computer from letting go? Opening and closing this file with MSWordpad is
equally quick on both machines, however, MSWord exibits the same problem which
leads me to believe the problem is with the way Office97 has installed on Gamma.
Any suggestions to correct this perplexing problem will be welcome.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>Excel is my data manager for SC so this
problem causes delays to intraday data collection.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2><BR>sincerely<BR><BR>Richard
Parsons<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Feb 16 23:31:51 1998
Received: from mx1.eskimo.com (smartlst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [204.122.16.48])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22317
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 10:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smartlst@xxxxxxxxx)
by mx1.eskimo.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA05932;
Mon, 16 Feb 1998 10:00:58 -0800
Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 10:00:58 -0800
Message-Id: <199802161800.KAA01047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: swisdom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 09:58:13 +0000
To: stoica@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: Shane Wisdom <swisdom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Direct trading to pits
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <m0y4Tjm-000l5iC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <199802160754_MC2-3373-FEF3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mx1.eskimo.com id KAA05873
Resent-Message-ID: <"QE8S41.0.9S1.Mx7wq"@mx1>
Resent-From: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/14206
X-Loop: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
X-UIDL: b0767e77cb08c01f8428a68255ca2120
You can learn more about using the LEO software for online trading
at<http://www.tradecenterinc.com/> www.tradecenterinc.com
If you would like a free demo, email your contact information to
shane.wisdom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or call me direct at 800.894.8194. All
questions are welcome.
Shane Wisdom
Trade Center, Inc
>Paul,
>is a homepage where we could find out more about his?
>Thanks.
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 07:53:19 -0500
>> From: Paul Weston <PaulWeston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Direct trading to pits
>> To: "INTERNET:omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Message text written by INTERNET:omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> I am looking to trade direct without calling a broker via the internet. I
>> discussed with my broker and he suggested I look at LEO through LFG. Is
>> there
>> much difference with these internet firms? I know there has been much
>> discussion about this recently but I do not know how to access the
>> archives. I
>> would be interested in this address as well.
>> Any web-site or publication rate these services? The market I will be
>> trading
>> will be the S&P. Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> John Curry
>> <
>>
>>
>> John -
>>
>> There is a lot of difference between LEO and the other systems. LEO is the
>> only system that has a direct readout of the trades in the pit. All the
>> rest of the systems go to the floor and are then signaled to the pit.
>>
>> Right now, the LEO readout is on the side of the pit that handles small
>> orders (<20). They have plans to put a 2nd station on the side of the pit
>> for large orders.
>>
>> I was just there on Thurs and saw the operation and was most impressed.
>> Now, if I can just get a decent commission rate I would switch to them.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul Weston
>>
>>
>>
>
>brgds from Berlin
>Marian Stoica
>__________________
>stoica@xxxxxxxxxxx
>stoica@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
|