[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: editing ticks of ORCL



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In a message dated 97-12-11 00:08:40 EST, Rod Grisham wrote:

<< 
 I am sure this has been discussed here before, but I cannot
 find it in the messages I have kept.  Would someone refresh
 my memory, please?
 
 Today ORCL passed the magic limit of the number of ticks the TS
 data editor can handle without the editor causing the server to
 crash and abort.  Of course, I have at least one bad tick - a one
 minute chart goes to zero.  Is there any way to export the ticks,
 edit them externally, and then import the cleaned data?  I am 
 talking about TS4 which uses the *.omz format to "copy out" and
 "paste in."
  >>

I do not know of any "external" way to edit bad ticks once a symbol 
crosses 33,000 ticks. They certainly can not be edited internally, in 
TS, no matter you do. The bottom line is that that bad ORCL tick on 
Dec 9 made the tick collection for the stock unusable and ORCL 
untradable. If you use 45 days to build your intraday chart, you'll have 
to wait that long collecting data before the bad tick stops affecting your 
chart. While waiting, keep your fingers crossed that you won't be hit 
with another bad tick, returning you to square one, etc., etc., etc. 
Send your thanks to Omega. 

Concerning this problem, I wrote to Bill Cruz on June 1 (a copy of the 
full text was posted here on June 2):

"...You may recall my letters as well as our telephone 
conversation of last year urging you to correct TradeStation's 
inability to edit symbols generating more than 13,000 ticks, 
that is, the symbols for high-volume stocks that by definition 
are prime vehicles for stock traders. I argued then that a 
single bad tick could ruin a valuable tick collection for a 
particular symbol which is an indespensable tool for trading. 
When that shortcoming was finally fixed in build 16, your 
technical support assured me that TradeStation would be 
able to handle symbols generating hundreds of thousand 
ticks a day, an assurance that seems to have been too 
optimistic.

Although this problem affects stocks traders only, whose 
satisfaction seems to have been a traditionally low priority 
for Omega (for example, unlike future traders, the former 
can not archive their valuable tick data), I hope you will 
have it resolved as soon as possible..."

Then, on July 15, after another occurence, I wrote to Bill Cruz 
again:

"...Once again, I urge you to have this defect fixed as 
soon as possible. Frankly, I do not believe that an intraday 
charting program lacking the capability to edit high volume 
stocks should be promoted, explicitly or implicitly, as a tool 
for stock traders. If Omega is not interested in fixing the 
defect, perhaps it should consider to market TS with an 
appropriate disclaimer..." 

Unfortunately, Omega refused to correct this fatal law, saying it will be 
corrected in TS5. That is unacceptable. The incidence of days crossing 
the 33,000 tick treshold is on the rise. Since May, AMAT crossed the 
treshold once. ASND and ORCL did so twice each (the latter reached 
almost 113,600 ticks on the 9th, and almost 61,000 on the 10th), while 
INTC went over the limit 10 (!) times.  

The program is dangerous now. It may cause financial losses by 
rendering your data collection worthless, and by stopping you from 
trading at a critical time. 

Wonder what will happen if someone gets seriously hurt because of 
Omega's failure to provide a functional product in a timely fashion. It 
may be a disaster waiting to happen. But note, Rod, that there is very 
little interest in this issue among the members of this illustrious list who 
seem to be absorbed by other subject matter. So, unfortunately, it is 
up to you, and me, and the remaining one or two stock traders on this 
list to get Omega to fix this serious flaw without delay. Please contact 
Omega and demand an action.

Igor Uhrik