Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: best indicator

[hitendra@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Along with it follow violation of higher top an higher bottom or vice vera. See important tren line violation. Most importantly risk per trade and strategy planning/trade management. You might great indicator by using statistical, geometric, algebra, economic etc but if risk management is not in place then no use. Please remember any mode of analysis is a probability therefore risk management ids key. Those who don't understand need to think if they want to use TA as the mode for trading.
About cycles yes they work well provided you are able to catch one. Fund manager show returns probably because they money power and lucky to part of it. Lot of insider help. Half the time, fund manager receive broker and manament presentation and story. If the same fund manager is not part of any fund theb he may not be able to replicate the same performance.
www.stockmechanics.com

Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

---

From: "rsb_44" <rsb_44@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:30:07 -0000

To: <equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: best indicator

 

I believe divergences are a class of indicators that by definition are leading - totally apart from their accuracy or usefulness.

--- In equismetastock@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Butler" <pat494@xxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been using many indicators over the years e.g. rsi, Macd, moving averages etc.
> Mostly all of them are lagging ( for obvious reasons ) etc. But one does need an indicator or perhaps better a pair of indicators. Where one covers the other's deficiences.
>
> Which 2 or more would you recommend to concentrate on ?
>
> thx
>
> Pat
>

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___