h>hhv(h,10) will always be false.
h>ref(hhv(h,
9),-1) is correct.
h=hhv(h,10) isn't, since we can easily have a repeated high.
Regards,
mc
--- In equismetastock@yahoogroups.com, pumrysh <no_reply@xx.> wrote:
>
> So far we have
>
> H = HHV(H,10)
>
> and
>
> H>Ref(HHV(H,9),-1)
>
> Since we are looking for a "new high" would we really want our high to be egual to the highest high of the last 10 days?
>
> Shouldn't we look for a high that is higher than the highest high of the last 10 days?
>
> If we use a ref(HHV(H,9),-1) would we be comparing our values to the latest set of high values or the set that was just prior?
>
>
> Therefore I believe that using H > HHV(H,10) will give us the value we are looking for.
>
> Anyone else agree?
>
>
> Preston
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In equismetastock@yahoogroups.com, "gpham01" <gpham01@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I am trying to write a exploration that will search for stocks at a 10 day new high. I'm not haveing much luck, Does anyone have any code that would point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > gpham01
> >
>