Peter,
You are very much right.
How sad it has to end like it but yet
a nice line of thinking to smoothen the Rainbow itself and amazing at
the way it tackles 'gaps'.
Guess Wabbit did not want to spoon feed us in his post
in equis forum (link given in the earlier post by Preston) but wanted us
to do a bit of work - fair enough.
MS gives Rainbow Oscillator itself as a built-in
formula and hence it is only
Mov( Fml( "Rainbow Oscillator") , 81 , E
)
Thanks,
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:25
PM
Subject: RE: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re:
adjusted moving averages & zerolagoscillators
GV,
You are on the right track for the Rahul Mohinder
Oscillator formula. The following
formula follows it perfectly:
Mov(100 * (CLOSE - ((Mov(C,2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S) + Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)
+ Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S))
/ 10)) / (HHV(C,10) - LLV(C,10)),81,E)
Good luck, Pete
__._,_.___
__,_._,___
|