| 
 Peter, 
  
You are very much right. 
  
How sad it has to end like it but yet 
a nice line of thinking to smoothen the Rainbow itself and amazing at 
the way it tackles 'gaps'. 
  
Guess Wabbit did not want to spoon feed us in his post 
in equis forum (link given in the earlier post by Preston) but wanted us 
to do a bit of work - fair enough. 
  
MS gives Rainbow Oscillator itself as a built-in 
formula and hence it is only  
  
Mov(  Fml( "Rainbow Oscillator") , 81 , E 
) 
  
Thanks, 
  
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 10:25 
  PM 
  Subject: RE: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re: 
  adjusted moving averages & zerolagoscillators 
  
  GV,
  You are on the right track for the Rahul Mohinder 
  Oscillator formula.  The following 
  formula follows it perfectly:
 
  Mov(100 * (CLOSE - ((Mov(C,2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S) + Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S) 
  + Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(Mov(C,2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S),2,S)) 
  / 10)) / (HHV(C,10) - LLV(C,10)),81,E)
  Good luck, Pete
  
   
 
 
    
 
__._,_.___
     
    
 
      
   
__,_._,___
 |