Sorry, it I missed seeing the original plot from
MC's code as it was masked by third plot. Great minds think
alike?
Roy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:17
AM
Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re:
If Then Else Neutral
Hi Kevin
After looking at MC's code it occurs to me that a
possible visual solution to your problem could be to have two
plots, one as per the original and one where the value from the point of
crossover is held for one bar longer? The delay for the second plot would
only be applied to specified bars, not to the entire plot. I haven't attempted
to code this thought but I'm confident that it wouldn't be that difficult
to do.
Regards
Roy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 8:20
AM
Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Re:
If Then Else Neutral
Hello Preston,
Many thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately,
this formula still doesn't do the trick as it just shifts the original plot
back a bar. The principle is correct when using the Gann HiLo Activator for
intraday trading but for trading daily bars, the plot must be offset by one
bar (according to Gann).
On the bar on which the trend direction
changes, i.e. where the close is above/below the 3MA high/low, the plots
should overlap, i.e. there should be BOTH a Mov(H,3,S) AND a Mov(L,3,S)
plotted, not one or the other, which is the result of
HiLo:=If(HLv=-1,Mov(H,Lb,S),Mov(L,Lb,S)).
The reason
being is that when trading the Gann System, and a long trade is taken on,
say, a close above Mov(H,3,S), the initial stop is a break below Mov(L,3,S).
That is why we need the plots overlapping on that bar. The If statement as
it stands gives us an either/or.
Once again, I really appreciate your
input.
Regards, Kevin
At 05:28 PM 2/14/2009 Saturday,
you wrote:
Kevin,
The formula was
originally written back in 1999 and posted on the Guppy site back in
April of 2000. Strange that no one saw the problem until now. Maybe a
result of the bear market.
The formula as posted works correctly.
It plots either a 3MA high or a 3MA low overlaping on the bar at which
the close is greater/less than " YESTERDAY'S " MA. Notice the use of
the ref statement in the first
line...HLd:=If(CLOSE>Ref(Mov(H,3,S),-1) So we are indeed
looking for a close greater that yesterday's MA.
To make the
change you want simply change the formula to:
{Gann HiLo Kevin
Modified} Lb:=Input("Look-Back
Periods?",2,80,3); HLd:=If(CLOSE>Mov(H,Lb,S), {then}1, {else}If(CLOSE<Mov(L,Lb,S), {then}-1, {else}0)); HLv:=ValueWhen(1,HLd<>0,HLd); HiLo:=If(HLv=-1, {then}Mov(H,Lb,S), {else}Mov(L,Lb,S)); HiLo;{end}
Now
you should get a resulting plot of either a 3MA high or 3MA low on the
bar at which the close is greater/less than the "current"
MA.
Preston
--- In equismetastock@yahoogroups.com,
Kevin Barry <kevin_barry@...> wrote: > >
Hello, > > I am in the process of rewriting the Gann Hi-Lo
indicator using as my > starting point the following formula by
Adam Hefner: > >
HLd:=If(CLOSE>Ref(Mov(H,3,S),-1), > {then}1, >
{else}If(CLOSE<Ref(Mov(L,3,S),-1), > {then}-1, >
{else}0)); > HLv:=ValueWhen(1,HLd<>0,HLd); >
HiLo:=If(HLv=-1, > {then}Mov(H,3,S), >
{else}Mov(L,3,S)); > HiLo; > > The resulting plot
is not quite correct because the 3MA high and the 3MA > low
plots should overlap on the bar at which the close is greater/less
than > the current MA. > > The obvious solution is to
create two plots GannHi and GannLo to replace > the HiLo plot.
However, we would need to specify an If statement without > the
ELSE condition. > > We can't write
If(HLv=-1,Mov(H,3,S),0) because it doesn't plot
correctly. > > Any suggestions for creating an equivalent
of IF without the need to > provide an ELSE parameter? >
> Many thanks in advance. > > Regards, >
Kevin >
__________ NOD32 3852 (20090213) Information
__________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
__________
NOD32 3853 (20090214) Information __________
This message was checked
by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
__._,_.___
__,_._,___
|